[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: HEAD OF CATTLE: Voting Director AT Large From: vanda@uol.com.br Nothing else to speak on both additional candidates. Non already is inside of the voting roll. I still hope, for the ALAC good, that winner de facto has conditions for participating in the Board. Be a person very balanced, with disposition for the work and knowledge excellent of all the subjects of ICANN. That she is also an able person to express its thoughts of form clear and to make friends between those of Staff and that is convincing in their principles in defesa of ALAC. An elect one which non counts on the appreciation of baord will be very desgastante for ALAC and a deservicio for our group. Those that they have responsibility to vote that infórmense best the possible thing to vote in favor of ALAC. Hugs to all Vanda Scartezini Pole Consulting Associados IT Trend Tree-lined avenue Holy 1470 - 1407,8 01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 -----Mensagem original Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post nome of Presidency Internaut Shipment command post: second-feira, 8 of novembro of 2010 22:43 It stops: Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.; cveraq@gmail.com; ' Andrés Piazzá; lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjects that I create they must of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise to us support to some person to enter to board by the users. I understand that to who we give our endorsement him it must of being a person with a fort loop with the end users of Internet. It must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly and in freedom of action, with the only pressure of knowing itself responsible for to express opinions and positions that respect them point of view which they are spilled different the THIN ones. I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and in the THIN ones on the part of the users doubtlessly benefit to organization, I believe that to understand that what becomes for benefit of users are against ICANN, put in a place incomodo to us e very undesirable. I continue insisting like the first day that our organization entrancea ICANN, that I inhale to a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (companies, academic users, sectors and governments), but I am not foolishand also me first passage seems important east that they are 1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that it can modify some position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverse ones forms to see the "World of Internet", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers of Dominion, and also that can without doubt do that others toits side also they accompany that same position. I do not understand but that we are voting. It will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not going to have in account our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if itis thus it stops that we would vote it? We would be in that line of thought choosing to our twig? On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that is had happened in the list. There was no sufficient time so that are possible to be presented/displayed the candidates, No there was also a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared? It is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates present/display untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I create to understand that thus it was but is thus I request excuses) With respect and cordiality Sergio Saline I carry Original Message From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro@cantv.net> To: "' Internautá Presidency" <presidencia@internauta.org.ar>; <cveraq@gmail.com>; "' Andrés Piazzá" <andrespiazza@gmail.com>; <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M. Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users (against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single. Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support in one community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to difference of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. salgueiro.jo@gmail.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/259b419ba5.html --]]