FW: Reminder: Briefing on Proposed for Framework FY10 Operating Plan and Budget 30 April 05:00 UTC
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: Reminder: Briefing on Proposed for Framework FY10 Operating Plan and Budget 30 April 05:00 UTC From: andrespiazzagpj@hotmail.com Considered: Today we were reviewing with Dev, once again, this subject that wins tomorrow. We have already discussed it in Mexico and the Teleconferencing. Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO
From: Heidi.Ullrich@icann.org > To: AT-LARGE@ATLARGE-LISTS.ICANN.ORG; alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:09:26 -0700 > Subject: [ AT-Large ] Reminder: Briefing on Proposed for Framework FY10 Operating Plan and Budget 30 April 05:00 UTC > > Dear All, > > Kevin Wilson, ICANN Chief Financial Officer, will be giving to briefing on the Proposed for Framework the FY10 Operating Plan and Budget AT 05:00 UTC 30 April. > > Details of this Briefing Session, including agenda, presentation, Marinates Connect Link, and participation information plows available here: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?budget_ops_meeting_30_april_2009. > > The session will be open to all members of the AT-Large community worldwide. Interpretation into FR and IS will not be available on this call. If you would like to request to dial-out, please inform AT-Large staff AT staff@atlarge.icann.org. > > Ace background to this call, the Proposed for Framework the FY10 Operat! ing Plan and Budget, which was first presented AT the ICANNMeeting in Mexico City, is currently seeking comments from the public.The draft FY10 Operating Plan and Budget is scheduled to be posted by 17 May 2009. The Board Finance Committee is currently scheduled to adopt the FY10 Operating Plan and Budget during the ICANN Meeting in Sydney. > > The Proposed for Framework the Fiscal Year 2010 (FY10)Operating Plan and available Budget is in the five languages here: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-17feb09-en.htm > > Additional consultation details may be found here: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2010 > > Regards, > > Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms > ICANN AT-Large Staff > email: staff@atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > AT-Large mailing list > AT-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at! -large_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > AT-Large Official Site: ht! tp://atl arge.icann.org
_________________________________________________________________ For color coding safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_... _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/97670c8e54.html --]]
Here's the proposed text I will send later this evening as a official statement from LACRALO. I know that there was support to endorse EURALO's statement, but I've added additional statements re:travel support that I think needs to be said. So comments on the below statement are welcome. Dev Anand Teelucksingh Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society, LACRALO Secretariat ------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir On behalf of the LACRALO, I wish to submit the following comments on the "Proposed Framework for ICANN's FY10 Operating Plan and Budget". The Latin American and Caribbean Regional At-Large Organisation endorses the text of the EURALO's statement on the Operational Plan and Budget as posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/op-budget-fy2010/msg00006.html. ICANN needs to fund travel support for all constituencies (ALAC, At-Large, GNSO, SSAC, etc.) to participate at their meetings and should not increase travel support for a constituency at the expense of another. ICANN should identify potential cost savings by doing a cost breakdown for each meeting venue, where the costs (airline costs, accommodations, per-diem, etc) of having the constituencies from each region present at such a meeting identified and compared with other meeting venues. A possible outcome of such an excercise would be identifying meeting venues which could be used by ICANN on a regular basis. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Colleagues: I am on record for supporting the EURALO statement so this statement has my support with a slight change. I would suggest that the 2nd to final paragraph of the statement recognize that changing meeting venues across the world gives ICANN a really good opportunity to interact with local constituencies on a regular basis. I submit this is a worthwhile political objective and needs to be more providently exploited by the At-Large. To compare, the annual meeting of the World Bank and IMF is usually held in the spring in Washington DC. I quite forgot how it could be until I ran into it last weekend. This meeting is attended by Ministers of Finance with leading national technocrats of all member governments and their retinue. Prices for hotel rooms and rental cars spike so your finances do take a hit. In any event, quite apart from the significant economic gains to the DC community, it reinforced the merits of ICANN's approach. Carlton Samuels On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin@ttcsweb.org>wrote:
Here's the proposed text I will send later this evening as a official statement from LACRALO. I know that there was support to endorse EURALO's statement, but I've added additional statements re:travel support that I think needs to be said. So comments on the below statement are welcome.
Dev Anand Teelucksingh Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society, LACRALO Secretariat
-------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir
On behalf of the LACRALO, I wish to submit the following comments on the "Proposed Framework for ICANN's FY10 Operating Plan and Budget".
The Latin American and Caribbean Regional At-Large Organisation endorses the text of the EURALO's statement on the Operational Plan and Budget as posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/op-budget-fy2010/msg00006.html.
ICANN needs to fund travel support for all constituencies (ALAC, At-Large, GNSO, SSAC, etc.) to participate at their meetings and should not increase travel support for a constituency at the expense of another.
ICANN should identify potential cost savings by doing a cost breakdown for each meeting venue, where the costs (airline costs, accommodations, per-diem, etc) of having the constituencies from each region present at such a meeting identified and compared with other meeting venues.
A possible outcome of such an excercise would be identifying meeting venues which could be used by ICANN on a regular basis.
------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
participants (3)
-
andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com -
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh