? = Utf-8 q = M = C3 = C3 = B1a_al_fuego_de_la_gobe A1s_le == utf-8 q = rnanza???
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:? = Utf-8 q = M = C3 = C3 = B1a_al_fuego_de_la_gobe A1s_le == utf-8 q = rnanza??? From: bronstein.sergio@gmail.com Delhi Declaration for a Fair and Equitable Coalition Internet Just Net <http://alainet.org/active/show_author.phtml?autor_apellido=Coalici%F3n+Just+...> Ranked: Social Organization: * Communication * <http://alainet.org/active/show_categorias.php3?movsocial=Comunicacion> , | International: * International * <http://alainet.org/active/show_categorias.php3?internacional=Internacional> , | Communication: * Communication * <http://alainet.org/active/show_categorias.php3?comunicacion=Comunicacion> , * DerechoComunicacion * <http://alainet.org/active/show_categorias.php3?comunicacion=DerechoComunicac...> , * NuevasTecnologias * <http://alainet.org/active/show_categorias.php3?comunicacion=NuevasTecnologia...> , | Available in: * Spanish * <http://alainet.org/active/72842> * Inglés * <http://alainet.org/active/73019> Share: ------------------------------ Internet has become a vital social infrastructure importance of a profound impact on our societies. We are all citizens of a world mediated by the Internet, whether we are the minority who uses or the majority does not. * In our world Internet ** should contribute to the advancement of human rights and social justice. The Internet governance must be truly democratic. * With the Internet, are reorganizing public institutions, particularly those related to governance, welfare, health and education and key sectors such as the media, the communications, transportation and finance. It has transformed the way we do many things; however, the benefits promised to everyone is not performed properly. On the contrary: we are witnessing mass surveillance, abuse of personal data and its use as a means of social and political control of the monopolization, commodification and monetization of information and knowledge; inequitable finance flows between poor and rich, and the erosion of cultural diversity. Many decisions techniques, supposedly "neutral" in practice have fostered social injustice, since technology architectures developed often to promote vested interests, increasingly determine the relations and the social, economic, cultural and political processes. The opportunities for the masses to participate in the benefits Internet real and fully realize its great potential, frustrated due to the increasing control of the Internet by those in power: large corporations and some national governments.They use their central positions of influence to consolidate power and establish a new global system of control and exploitation; and under the pretext of promote liberalization actually reinforce dominance and profitability of big business to the detriment of the public interest, and impose the dominant position of certain national interests in detrimental to the interests and global welfare. The existing order of global Internet governance is inadequate. Lacks of democracy; is characterized by the absence of legitimacy, accountability accountability and transparency; by excessive influence of corporations which translates into subordinate regulatory bodies; and gives very little opportunity for effective participation of people, especially in developing countries. This situation can only remedied through fundamental changes to the current arrangements for governance. Internet governance must start from the understanding that interconnectivity may only be at the service of human rights and social justice, to the extent that encourage and support the power distributed, especially towards the bases, but also through the different digital-social, economic, political gaps. At Therefore, to ensure that the Internet does not lead, in practice, a greater centralization of power, requires appropriate interventions all levels of Internet governance. Building a frame effective in achieving these goals is the biggest challenge today in terms global Internet governance. In this spirit, we propose the following principles. These should be the basis for the development of an Internet that advances across the world of human rights and social justice, and the reconfiguration of Internet governance to a space truly democratic.Given that technical architectures determine relationships and increasingly social, economic, cultural and political, technical decisions affecting these Internet issues. * Internet as a Global Common Good * 1. The Internet is a key social environment and, in crucial respects, a well global commons. It is a site for the global exchange of knowledge and information, a space for free expression and association, a means to deliberation and democratic participation, a channel for the delivery of essential social and public services, and a scaffold for new models of economic activity. Therefore, all people of the world, including those that are not currently connected to the Internet, must be the ability to collaboratively shape the evolution of the Internet through appropriate governance processes that are democratic and participatory. Two. Internet should remain a public space.When a credible divergence between the usefulness of the Internet for public purposes and the particular interests of Internet services or companies technology, the public interest must prevail, and the service must be subject to regulation as a public service. Three.'s Basic or essential features and Internet services, as email, search services and web platforms social networks should be available to all people as assets public. April. Should encourage and promote community ownership and nonprofit infrastructure, applications, services and content, including through access to public funding and other means. May. Internet should be used only for peaceful purposes and this should be recognized by states in a binding and enforceable instrument. 6.Internet and the wider digital economy have become factors highly significant in the distribution and redistribution of wealth, employment and opportunities for economic welfare both within countries and globally. They must take steps to ensure economic justice, so that the overall benefits of increased Internet efficiency resulting from innovation and to be distributed in the form wide by, among others: the decentralization of opportunities Digital Enterprise and jobs; investments in ICT use for economic development activities locally based; opportunities for self-development, self-employment and job training; and increased contributions for public welfare, both within countries and globally. 7.The Internet economy, as well as other areas of the global economy, should be subject to collection and the fair and equitable sharing of revenue worldwide, recognizing that the concentration of international electronic commerce based on the global North is a threat tax revenue for the global South. * Democratizing the Internet architecture * 8. Starting from the recognition that the Internet is a common good Overall, all layers of the Internet architecture must be designed to prevent the concentration of power and centralized control. 9. Neutrality Network, and other similar forms of 'neutrality platforms' in the top layers of the Internet, should be mandatory in order to preserve diversity online and to avoid monopolies, either in content or in the provision of public services essential, in both mobile architectures such as fixed network. 10. For an open and decentralized Internet application is required strict open and public standards.Open standards allow implementation in fully interoperable way for any person in any type of software, including free software and Open Source (SLCA). The trend towards the privatization of standards Digital must be stopped and should introduce measures to ensure that standards are publicly owned, and repositories and application. 11. The architecture of cloud computing should improve digital functionality and efficiency, without reducing the control and options user. It should also allow users to protections appropriate legal, either through national courts or effective international agreements. 12. The personal and social data should belong to the individual or respective social group. Should establish policy frameworks necessary to operationalize the public control and ownership of data digital. * Free Internet * 13.Everyone has the right to basic digital empowerment, which includes the right to: Internet access to its content and applications; participate in the development of content and applications; and receive the training necessary for effective use of Internet and other digital tools. 14. The right to access and contribute to the development of Internet, including its content, particularly by sectors marginalized, minority and indigenous peoples is essential for maintenance of cultural and linguistic diversity should be guaranteed through positive discrimination and affirmative action. 15. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression and association online. Any restriction, because of concerns security or otherwise, should be for strictly defined purposes and accordance with internationally accepted principles of necessity, proportionality and judicial oversight. 16. Everyone has the right to privacy and to use Internet free of mass surveillance.Any monitoring, because of security concerns or other should be for purposes strictly defined and in accordance with accepted principles world of necessity, proportionality and judicial oversight. 17. Individuals should be able to enjoy all their rights and prerogatives as citizens / as, even if they choose not to access the Internet. Access to and use of the Internet should not become a requirement for access to public services. * Internet govern in the public interest * 18. Overall, there is a serious democratic deficit regarding the Internet governance. It is urgent to establish platforms and mechanisms Suitable for global Internet governance that are democratic and participatory. They should be anchored to the United Nations system United, and include innovative methods for continuous participation and depth of non-governmental actors in the formulation policy.Non-governmental actors involved must, in turn, be subject to appropriate transparency requirements, in particular about their sources of funding and its membership and decision-making processes. 19. The right to develop public policies related to Internet must be exclusively in the hands of those who legitimately represent and directly to the people. While there is an urgent need to deepen democracy through innovative methods of democracy participatory, they must not, in the name of "sectoral" model ( * Multi-stakeholder *) - include new forms of formal political power corporate interests. 20. Governance systems should be based on the recognition that Internet has a social impact, so the technical community Internet, with its singular focus on technical issues and not having the sufficient legitimacy to determine on your own. 21.The laws of a country or group of countries can not control or establish international technical governance structures and policy public Internet. The management of critical Internet resources should be internationalized. For this reason, the current control by a single country DNS / root zone must be replaced by a new institution transparent, accountable and representative internationally, by monitoring of core management functions of Internet resources. 22. Every country should have the right to connect to the Internet. No country You can have the unilateral ability to disconnect another country or region Internet. 23. The rights of individuals and states must be articulated and protected with respect to the Internet, among others by creating appropriate implementation mechanisms. Such mechanisms are necessary, both nationally and internationally, and should include mechanisms conflict resolution. April 2014. * - Just Net Coalition: Coalition for a Fair and Internet Equitable. Declaration adopted after the meeting held in Delhi February 2014, which includes the founding principles of the Coalition. * Updated version on 04/16/2014 _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fa45f34fc5.html --]]
participants (1)
-
bronstein.sergio@gmail.com