Re: =?windows-1252?q?Dominio=�co=85_Aporte_DE_ACUI _ = =?windows-1252?q?a_la_lista=� =
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?Dominio=Èco=85_Aporte_DE_ACUI _ = =?windows-1252?q?a_la_lista=È = From: apisan@servidor.unam.mx Antonio, but putting the things a little more in clear. When originally it proposed, ten years ago, that co could be used like alternative to com by the interested ones, the one was armed of San Quintín because "it was tried to sell the name of the Mother country "or something of which this affirmation is not a version very exaggerated. The process of the decade had like objective to create new rules for new operator and to replace the previous one. Now the new rules are being read because co can be used like alternative to com by the interested ones. How it explains ACUI or how ACUI reacts or how it denies like erroneous ACUI this interpretation, that indeed could be erroneous or incomplete? EYE: this question has meaning for the history of ccTLDs and by as much for the history and the culture of Internet in the region, and by possible extension of its criteria, in a species of Compared Right, a other countries, thus to include/understand the precedent are important. Not brother, respected deals with an attempt of interference of a country and wanted. Alexander Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, [ ISO-8859-1 ] Antonio Medina Go'mez wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:18:04 -0500 > From: "[ ISO-8859-1 ] Antonio Medina Go'mez" <amedinagomez@gmail.com> > To: "Spanish [ ISO-8859-1 ] LACRALO" <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] Dominio.co~E Aporte OF ACUI to > list. > > Dear friends > > From the Colombian Association of Users of Internet we have been kind > to the commentaries in relation to dominio.co and as ALS of Lacralo we want > to make the following contributions. > > Is of fundamental importance of mentioning that the evolution and development of > dominions in Colombia associated to co has lived a complex process but > also participativo. > > the interested ones in knowing some these aspects, can accede to > vestibule of the Ministry of the Technologies of Informationand the Communications > through the following connection > http://www.mintic.gov.co/mincom/faces/index.jsp?id=1279 > > the Colombian Association of Users of Internet in the development of th! is > process has participated actively in representation of the community of > usuary of Internet of Colombia. > > Is necessary to mention that a public process - at least of 10 was made > years -, in head of the Ministry of the Technologies of Information and > Communications, MINTIC, process that has been characterized - like many others > by being opened, transparent and participativo, and the different people and > organizations who participated, at their moment presented/displayed his publicly > points of view or written proposal, scene of > respect and of consensus. > > These processes allowed him, to in that then Ministry of > Communications, to establish, as much the model of management and administration like > the inherent policies to that administration and in individual the criteria > necessary for the evaluation and selection of the organization in charge of > administration. The last years, in this context a process was lived on > well-known Licitation and ope! nly socialized. > > In these processes ACUI participated makin! g the co rresponding contributions in > work meetings that helped the Ministry to define aspects > excellent and to help to obtain consensus, that is what finally it enriches > these discussions, all it in a democratic atmosphere. > > Is important then to remember that the Ministry of the Technologies > of Information and the Communications has under its responsibility > policy definition, the activities of control and monitoring of > dominio.co <http://domino.co/>. > > Hay to emphasize that today dominio.co offers more value forthe community of > Internet. It allows him to the users to be recognized and tobe located in Internet a > global level, to take advantage of a standard world-wide class, with clear rules and > nondiscretionary of a single person. And this also has enormous > benefits that are translated in efficiency, service, capacity and price. > > Today we have good, advisable, interesting the dominion and most important, > result of a participativo process. We must contin! ue the taskof > to work in an ambient transparency and of respect in order to obtain more and > better benefits usuary them and to support the decisions made in > consensus and right context. > > Antonio Medina Go'mez > President > Colombian Association of Users of Internet > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-lists... > > http://www.lacralo.org >
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0f5580174f.html --]]
Dear Antonio. Following the thought mentioned by Alex. I also want asking you what is the ACUI position, when the .co is now administrated by private company with very different interests than end users, without participation of end users in a National Bussiness, and How can explain the fact that .co will be use like a cc (national identification domain), and commercial identificator? I am really surprised for your words at the teleconference yesterday. Could you explain to me? The situation is not clear and I am worried for your end users representation. Are you participating or some other end user representative in .co ccTLD desitions? What was the participation of end users in definitions of Legal structure of ccTLD (used also like gTLD)? In what way are protected rights of end users? Do you (yourself or your ALS) receive some "contribution" from .co administrator? Why you made propaganda of .co in a facebook? Are you interested in a company growth? and in this case why? Carlos Aguirre _________________________________________________________________ Con Hotmail y Calendario organizar reuniones es muy fácil: enviá invitaciones y recibí confirmaciones de asistencia. http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx
participants (2)
-
apisan@servidor.unam.mx -
carlos aguirre