[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Voting Candidate NomCom - Staff Appreciation - Proposal From: hcarrascob@gmail.com Dear Jos, First of all thanks for clearing your absence from teleconference. I knew I had always sb problem you impidiparticipar magnitude. Now regarding your proposal, I disagree. Mainly because you have your mail sealado June 21, 2013 as follows: "The proposal is that LACRALO send the list of candidates for NOMCOM who accepted the nomination to then decide ALAC on these, upon evaluation thereof. This proposal will be open until June 24 (the date is our limit). In case of oppose anyone we send the complete list, as of that date, will be sending a full list to ALAC. " I opposed and many other also.Then I figured that with my objecin will be sufficient to make a choice as has been done traditionally. First of all, I think your attitude is anti-Democratic. Managing rules to the arrangement of those in power does not seem. A LACRALO you're not interested, you are interested in other things, and after that, do whatever it takes. So do not want to continue the tradition Democratic, and make the ballot respectively. Prefer to send "the list" as they do not force the statutes. I do not care if these lines have the effect that I did not leave chosen in the Nomcom. If telling the truth is the consequence, then I assume that consequence. I have a huge disappointment. I realize that the way it is aques politics unfortunate. I do not say against peers participating as candidates Nomcom, are wonderful candidates. I say against you as president. I think your attitude is Democratic or LACRALO benefit. Your not LACRALO candles, your candles by other interests. A greeting Humberto El 27/06/2013 12:44 am, JosFrancisco Arce wrote:

Estimados,

Primero quiero disculparme por ni haber podido participar ayer de la llamada. Tuve unos inconvenientes importantes.

Pero ahora he podido leer los emails y he recibido emails personales y quiere aclarar el panorama:

1) En el dia de ayer se tomo la desicion de ir a una votacion, personalmente no la tome y desconozco quien la tomo. Si quiero decirles que yo estoy en contra de tal desicion por varios motivos. Uno de ellos es que esa desicion la debe tomar la region y deberia haberse tomado ayer durante la teleconferencia. Otra es que los plazos estan vencidos y debemos ser respetuosos de los mismos cuando podemos hacerlo, y creo que este es un caso de ellos.

2) Debido a los hechos ocurridos creo y propongo suspender la votacion y mandar a ALAC la lista de candidatos, y aqui la justificacion: a) Si la region quiere ir a votar, como hay desacuerdos, y no hay consenso, primero deberia votarse si la mayoria quiere ir a vitacion o no, y si gana el si, recien ahi ir a votacion. Ustedes sabes que nuestra region debe funcionar por consenso y en caso de no obtenerlo debemos ser respetuosos de todas las posiciones. b) Nuestra region no esta obligada a especificar el candidato preferencial. De todas formas cada uno de ustedes lo puede manifestar en la wiki, donde todos, incluso ALAC puede ver esos apoyos.c) Creo que es la solucion que concilia los intereses de todos ya que estariamos respetando plazos y ALAC podria ver los apoyos a los candidatos en la wiki.

Les mando un saludo afectuoso

Jose Arce. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/233a3d2305.html --]]