[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Voting Director AT Large From: salgueiro.jo@gmail.com I understand your position Sergio, but the subject is that whatis discussed here is another thing and I feel that it was not clear during this brief time of interchange of opinions. Beyond of which I am going to indicate now, the time to do something already expired. One never considered to vote neither by JJ Subrenat nor by Avri Doria.They only they requested support of our THIN one since with the support of 3 of the 5 THIN ones they could enter the list of candidates to be considered for the selection. In this opportunity we were not choosing to one on another one, we could have supported to both. Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. salgueiro.jo@gmail.com Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Presidency Internaut Sent: Monday, 08 of November of 2010 08:13 p.m. It stops: Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.; cveraq@gmail.com; ' Andrés Piazzá; lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjects that I create they must of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise us thesupport to some person stops to enter to board by the users. I understand that to who we give our endorsement him she must of beinga person with a fort loop with the end users of Internet. It must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly and in freedom of action, with the only pressure of knowing how itself responsible to express opinions and positions that they respect them point of view that spill different the THIN ones. I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and in the THIN ones by part of the users doubtlessly benefits the organization, I believe that to understand that what one becomes for benefit of the users is against ICANN, us it puts in a place incomodo and very undesirable. I continue insisting like the first day that our organization entrancea ICANN, that I inhale a a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (companies, users, sectors academic and governments), but I am not foolish and also it seems to me important first east passage of which they are 1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that it can modify some position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverse forms of to see the "World of Internet ", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers of Dominion, and also that it can without place to doubts to cause that others to their side also accompany that same one position. I do not understand but that we are voting. It will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not going to have in account our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if it is thus sothat we would vote? We would be in that line of thought choosing to our twig? On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that is had happened in the list. There was no sufficient time so that are possible to be presented/displayed the candidates, There was also no a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared? It is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates present/display untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I create to understand that thus it was but it is thus I request excuses) With respect and cordiality Sergio Saline I carry Original Message From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro@cantv.net> To: "' Internautá Presidency" <presidencia@internauta.org.ar>; <cveraq@gmail.com>; "' Andrés Piazzá" <andrespiazza@gmail.com>; <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M. Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users (against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single. Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support in one community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to difference of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. salgueiro.jo@gmail.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/09a7716e31.html --]]