Re: [lac-discuss-en] Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Comments on Second Proposal CCWG Accountability From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Another related paragraph, this comment estcolocado in the wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Page+on+At-Large+Briefin g + + on + 2nd + CCWG-Draft Proposal Accountability + In that same document, the following paragraph: 154. Several commentators governments strongly objected change proposed 11 existing Core Value, which states that the ICANN retaining its roots in the private sector should recognize that Governments and public authorities are responsible for the policies public and must take into account the recommendations of such authorities. After a lengthy conversation, the CCWG proposed Liability address these concerns in two ways: First, to eliminate confusion about the meaning of private sector in the ICANN Bylaws, we propose a way to determine explicit that the private sector includes commercial stakeholders, society civil, technical community and the academic sector. Note: A minority suggests meaning that the private sector should be included in the description of trmino, by contrast, commercial suppliers, business users, individual end-users, civil society, the academic sector and technical community. Best regards Alberto Soto --- Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses. https://www.avast.com/antivirus [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/000459278c.html --]]
participants (1)
-
asoto@ibero-americano.org