[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Ultima_reuni = F3n_LACRALO? = From: sylvia@internautabrasil.org Dear Alberto: My arguments in this regard are: 1. - We have what ICANN's bylaws have in this area: ICANN's Nominating Committee asked the At-Large Advisory Committee to submit a list with ALAC Delegates from each of ICANN's five geographic regions. Voting members of the NomCom are appointed for a one year term, starting after the close of the Annual General Meeting 2013 and ending at the close of the Annual General Meeting 2014, and May be re-appointed for a Further term of one year subject to the requirement under the ICANN Bylaws. XI-2.4.e The ALAC Marshall, after Consultation with each THIN, Annually appoint five voting Delegates (two of Whom Shall not be Citizens of countries in the same Geographic Region, as defined According To Section 5 of Article VI to the Nominating Committee. So, ALAC requires each THIN consult, although the decision is not binding! Two. - Traditionally made a ballot in our THIN respect NOMCOM under. This is a custom of our THIN! And as you well sabs, the usual source of law is on the right International and of course in the United Nations. And do not forget that our rules are based on the rules of UN procedure. Therefore, although no specific estexpresamente, custom if is right in this case. Three. - And also, as the conference discuss the changes proposed a few days ago and in the conference are welcome but The nearest be considered in elections! Greetings all, Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein sylvia@internautabrasil.org Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org Secretary FLUI 2009-2013 sylvia_leite = Skype ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alberto Thicket Posted in: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:18 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: 'At-Large Staff' Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Last reunin LACRALO Dear, in the last reunin is tratel subject of a ballot in LACRALO for current charges by Ruling defined in ALAC. I preguntcules were current regulations procedures or made possible such ballot. Also mencionque if hacamos one ballot, the same shall not be binding, ie, that made no sense to do so because tena no bearing on who should define the election. In the same reunin, there were many voices calling transparency procedures to which adhere absolutely. Encontrninguna Continubuscando and regulations to support such ballot. Under the points made in this reuniny to not having had a satisfactory answer, ask the President and secrete sir, that report applies the rules to allow such a ballot. Best Regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d7f449a853.html --]]