[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS From: alberto@soto.net.ar Alexander, I read and reread ms the link you sent, I see In no side anyone should depart from its function in order to be reelected. I Interested JosArce it fails to reply or answer. If I want to observe the procedures, and that is not esthaciendo in any of your orders. First was that it was not transparent, and According the link you sent: "Note: Regulation of LACRALO, Sern nominations accepted for PERIOD minimum of four weeks from the date of the call for nominations, with eleccina performed no sooner than 48 hours after the the expiracin 8 weeks from the date of the call for nominations. (Rules 13.1, 13.2, 13.3). " With this it is clear that the process is transparent. After this was answered, that the choice was afirmabas operated by Staff, and claim one rendicin account, which according to the link ism you sent: "The 90-minute teleconference organizaruna Duracin to Questions and Exhibition candidates / as to both charges during the week of 8 to 15 March 2013. In case it is necessary, the second realizaruna teleconference in the week from 16 to 23 March 2013. As is always, we encourage you to submit questions for ALS candidates for written to be announced once the date of the meeting, but estarpermitido also make them for the same. " Thus, any previously podrrequerir any candidate who answer questions that you do the same. I think it's your opportunity, following normal procedures, without offending anyone, and Best of all, ajustndose to right. I will not accept that violate established procedures and force, and that every answer you can think of someone calling out something new and out of the proceedings. And I await an answer from staff Vanda, I think unavoidable for office. I am so tired of grievances in LACRALO free, and I do not permitindolos we should follow. Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:18 pm To: Alberto Soto, 'Vanda UOL'; 'Johnny Laureano' CC: 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS Alberto, in https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40928090 apparent latitude with the President and Secretary of LACRALO for request that they be independent parties who organize the debates and teleconferences, and opportunity - and wasted - to isolate the conduction of the choice. A few hours left to submit reports to assess their Gestin. Again, in the case of Sylvia's rendicin estfacilitada accounts because she participates in an election competitive. In the case of the President, have received a single message from you that explcitamente passes the above opportunities. We then face an attempted reeleccin driven by the same person presents reeleccin - besides techniques activities to correctly attribute to "staff" - which manifests no or too sparse a will democrtica. The legitimacy dficit tendrconsecuencias undoubtedly. Up here, with exceptions, which I think are worth discussing because the silence of the Presidency. Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto [Alberto@soto.net.ar] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 16:44 To: 'Vanda UOL'; 'Johnny Laureano' CC: 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS If AS, suggest that consultations be made before insulting and LACRALO offend wing President and Staff. Vanda, I ExtrAA that occupying a position like that you occupy in NONCOM, guarantees some who are against all proceedings. I ask you please answer me that you support your request rules query. Thank you very much Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Vanda UOL Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 24:01 To: Johnny Laureano CC: ICANN At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS In these cases I think it is prudent to consult lawyers Icann because we are part of the structure of ICANN (ICANN pay our costs) to avoid problems as we had plenty of An LACRALO. I feel that Dr. Alexander has knowledge to do so, aslo ask you did this consultation process before finalizing it. Hugs Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone On 03.08.2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano@yahoo.com> wrote:

Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,

Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad de these processes are painful for everyone.

Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el election, such as proposed by Dr. Pisanty, it seems sensible and reasonable.

Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los

Johnny Laureano AUI PERU - ALS

--- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com>

From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan@unam.mx> Cc: "lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM

Dr. Pisanty:

Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo único que expresé y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los términos

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ed14c3bc76.html --]]