[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings - Initial Report From: jumaropi@yahoo.com Dear region Envo the information about opening comments UDRP. JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Social Communicator President-AGEIA DENSIColombia Twitter: @ JmanuRojas Join LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es  ----- Forwarded message ----- From: At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> To: ALAC Announce <alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Posted: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:40 a.m. Subject: [ALAC-Announce] Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings - Initial Report https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm < https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm> Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to Initial Report Comment / Reply Periods (*) Open Comment Date: 15 March 2013 Close Comment Date: 26 April 2013 - 23:59 UTC Reply Open Date: 27 April 2013 Reply Close Date: 17 May 2013 - 23:59 UTC Important Information Links Public Comment Announcement < https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm> To Submit Your Comments (Forum) <mailto:comments-locking-domain-name-15mar13@icann.org> View Comments Submitted <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-locking-domain-name-15mar13/> Brief Overview Originating Organization: GNSO Categories / Tags: * Policy Processes Purpose (Brief): The Generic Names Supporting Organization Working Group tasked with Addressing the issue of locking of a domain name subject to Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) has published its Initial Proceedings Report for public comment. Current Status: The Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group has published its Initial Report and is soliciting community input on the Preliminary Recommendations Contained in the report. Next Steps: Following review of the public comments received, the Working Group will Deliberations continue and finalize its report for submission to its the GNSO Council. Staff Contact: Marika Konings Staff Email Contact <mailto:Policy-staff@icann.org?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Locki ng% 20of% 20a% 20Domain 20Name%%% 20to% 20Subject 20UDRP% 20Proceedings% 20% E2% 80% 93% 20Initial% 20Public% 20Report% 20period 20comment%> Detailed Information Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose: In its Initial Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf> [PDF, 883 KB], the PDP Working Group presents preliminary eleven Recommendations, Which are expected to usefully Clarify and standardize how a domain name is locked and unlocked During the course of a UDRP Proceeding for all parties Involved.Amongst others, These Recommendations include: * A definition of 'locking' in the context of a UDRP Proceeding - the term "Lock" means Preventing any changes of registration and registrant [without impairing the resolution of the domain name] 1 < https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en . Htm # foot1> (Preliminary recommendation # 1) * Proposed modification of the UDRP rules to no longer require That the complainant sends a copy of the complaint to the respondent to avoid cyberflight2 < https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en . Htm # foot2> (Preliminary recommendation # 2) * Requirement for the record to 'lock' the domain name registration Following within 2 business days to request for verification from the UDRP Provider (Preliminary recommendation # 3) * Clarifying How To Deal With changes to contact information and / or lifting of proxy / privacy services (Preliminary recommendation # 7 and # 8) * Clarifying the process for the unlocking of a domain name registration Following the Conclusion of a UDRP proceeding (Preliminary recommendation # 9) In Addition to These Recommendations, the WG has put forward two possible options in its report to Clarify the process in case a settlement is Reached and community input is Requesting On These two options or possible alternatives. It is important to Emphasize That Most Of These preliminary Recommendations codify existing practices in line With The UDRP and are not expected to require any changes to the existing policy. However, These Should be ADOPTED Recommendations In Their current form, minor changes may need to be made to the UDRP Rules and / or UDRP Provider supplemental rules. Those interested in Providing input are Strongly Encouraged to Especially review section 5 and 6 of the Initial Report in Order to Obtain a Further Understanding Concerning the WG's thinking and rationale With Regards to These Recommendations as well as further details with Respect to the preliminary recommendations. In Addition to input on the preliminary Recommendations, the WG is Also interested to receive feedback on Further the expected impact These Recommendations Should be ADOPTED. The WG would like to Encourage all interested parties to submit Their These comments and suggestions so can be Considered as the WG Continues its Deliberations in view of finalizing its report and Recommendations in the next phase of the policy development process. 1 < https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en . Htm # text1> The WG is Considering adding the bracketed language and would welcome community input on the Proposed addition. 2 < https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en . Htm # text2> Cyberflight In This context means changing the registrant Information With The Intent to escape from the dispute. Section II: Background: The "locking" of a domain name registration Associated with UDRP proceedings That is something is not literally required by the UDRP as written, but is a That practice has Developed around it. As a result, there is no uniform approach, Which has resulted in confusion and Misunderstandings. To address This Issue, the GNSO Council Decided to initiate a Policy Development Process on 15 December 2011. As part of its Deliberations, the WG was Required to Consider the following questions: 1. Whether the creation of an outline of a Proposed procedure, Which to complainant must follow in order to register for a domain name to place on record lock, would be desirable. 2. Whether the creation of an outline of the steps of the process That a record can reasonably expect to take place During a UDRP dispute would be desirable. 3. Whether the time frame by Which to register a domain must lock after a Has been filed UDRP Should be standardized. 4a. Whether what constitutes a "locked" Domain Name Should be defined. 4b.Whether, eleven domain name is 'locked' pursuant to a UDRP proceeding, That the registrant information for domain name may be changed or modified. 5. Whether additional Safeguards Should be created for the protection of registrants in cases where the domain name is subject to a UDRP locked proceeding. Section III: Document and Resource Links: * Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to Initial Report - http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf> [PDF, 883 KB] * Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy < https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy> * Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/rules < https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/rules> * Working Group Workspace - https://community.icann.org/x/xq3bAQ < https://community.icann.org/x/xq3bAQ> Section IV: Additional Information: N / A (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date / Time are not guaranteed Considered to be any end in summary, analysis, reporting, or That decision-making takes place eleven this period lapses. ********** Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6acb2e6e4e.html --]]