I continue to believe that cross-constituency WGs, especially for issues this one is intended to cover, is the optimal path to sterling community involvement and output. ...another plea for membership of this WG. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date: Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM Subject: Re: [jcdwg] REPLY REQUESTED: Updated Version of Draft Charter - further small change To: jcdwg@icann.org All, Attached is a red-line version 8. My apologies for doing this but I realised that the previous draft may not work from a GAC point of view. Including the GAC as a ‘participating’ AC means that they will have to formally agree to signing up to the Charter and in the past this sort of thing has proved almost impossible for them. Better, in my view, to allow for their participation in the usual way which is to ‘observe’ and contribute. Thus, there is a small amendment to Background and 3 consequential amendments to 3.1. Happy to answer any questions. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator *Important Notice** - *This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. *From:* jcdwg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:jcdwg-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund *Sent:* Friday, 12 November 2010 10:46 *To:* jcdwg@icann.org *Subject:* [jcdwg] REPLY REQUESTED: Updated Version of Draft Charter Dear Drafting Team members, Here is the latest update of the Draft Charter for your review in redlined and clean formats. The changes that are incorporated are described below. Please let us know if you have any questions. *PLEASE NOTE: We need to turn this around quickly in order to finalize it so that it may be included for community discussion in Cartagena (document deadline is 15 November). Please reply with any comments in 24 hours from receipt of this email so that we can allow time for any final changes and discussion on the list. * Thank you, Julie Changes incorporated by Bart and Julie as Requested from Wednesday’s Meeting: 1. Harmonized terms (Co-Chairs and DSSA-WG) and removed highlighting 2. Minor edits in sections 1.0, 2.2, 3.1 3. Section 3.3 Access to and Protection of Confidential Information and Annex B: Changes to the procedures for handling confidential and proprietary information suggested by ICANN legal staff to make the terminology consistent and relax the requirement for signing the Affirmation form since it is not legally binding and this needs to be more clear. 4. Section 3.4 Statement of Interest: minor changes as well as a refocus in 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 on the activities of the DSSA- WG (as opposed to policy work) Changes suggested by Chuck Gomes: 1. Minor edits 2. Added one sentence in the first paragraph of ‘*3.4 Statements of Interest (SOI)*’ on page 4 3. Suggested edits to items 3 & 4 in response to Bart’s suggestion in ‘*3.4 Statements of Interest (SOI)*’ 4. Deleted item 5 in ‘*3.4 Statements of Interest (SOI)*’ because it duplicates the first sentence in item 4 and adjusted the numbering of the next two items 5. Edited item 6 (formerly 7) to be consistent with other edits made 6. Inserted text (in red) in the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 5: “Consensus calls should always make best efforts to involve the entire DSSA-WG.” 7. Inserted text (in red) in the first paragraph of ‘4. *Omission In or Unreasonable Impact of Charter*’ at the bottom of page 6: “In the event this charter does not provide guidance and/or the impact of the charter is unreasonable for conducting the business of the DSSA-WG, the Co-Chairs of the DSSA-WG shall decide if they think charter needs to be modified.” __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5611 (20101111) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5612 (20101111) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5616 (20101112) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ jcdwg mailing list jcdwg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/jcdwg