[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_EN _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?ALAC = From: andrespiazza@gmail.com Carlos, interesting your point of view. You can extend that idea IF Conditional applicable to the case? Greetings, Andrés The 14 of April of 2011 11:57, Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq@gmail.com>he wrote:

Dear friend and colleagues: > > soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons > but the main one is that > > 1. There are interests in game that with did not remain quiet. IF > ademas is a business so that it moves single > > IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > > votaria I NOT and who move to IF conditional by logica. > > Carlos > -----Original Message > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia@internauta.org.ar> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > To: <cveraq@gmail.com> > Reply-To: to presidencia@internauta.org.ar > Cc: <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÓ > N IN ALAC > > Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe that the vote would have of > to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > can consider in the future and looking for the way that thatcost > in certain cases (as vos good you describe the! m) is assimilated by > company and not by the user. > an affectionate greeting! > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we receivedorders that > humiliates our conscience or violates our common sense "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like > option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > > > > deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of > usuary normal. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return > obligatory i! n some cases DNSSEC for example command post institutions or c! ompanies financiers, who receive payments, governmental, etc > > > > the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation forexample in case of > redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > > > > Carlos Side > > > > > > -----Original Message > > From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto@ibero-americano.org> > > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > > To:<presidencia@internauta.org.ar>;< > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > > PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN > > ALAC > > > > Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time and insome > > things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seemthat you do not agree so in > > > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but in a recommendation of "very > > advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonable so that there is > costs > > associated ! that single would have to be assumed in certainconditions. > > can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? > > warm Greetings > > > > Alberto Grove > > IIISI > > > > original -----Mensaje > > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ]In name of > > presidency Argentina Internaut > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > > For: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN ALAC > > > > Dear companions of the LACRALO: > > Hay two subjects that have been sent to voting in ALAC: > > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the > > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability, > > security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaul of DNS > > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes day 15 of April - * > &! gt; > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a diff! erent po int of view that > > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * > > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > > the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > > ( > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > > > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > > dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602) > > > > * > > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope of Work and > > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > > 2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOIS RFC in the scope > > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of actionfor > > exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the16 of April > > > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > I make change my position would like to v! ote by * "IF". * > > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > > > iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > > or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 > > > > Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document at issue, since it is very > > rich and interesting the made declaration. > > Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carlton like stops > > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no > > attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one > > position on the same one, since I have assumed ! I have sent most of > > the subjects that have been put in ! voting, and single on two ocassions no > > I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second > > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems that we demanded what > > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no > > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > > to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhaps he would have > > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participation > > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and the Caribbean > > we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... > > warm Greetings > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org >

-- * Andrés Piazza * www.andrespiazza.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4b84b4df54.html --]]