[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Elections in May 2017 Desde: amedinagomez@gmail.com totally agree with Alejandro and Alberto The 27/2/2017 7:43, "Humberto Carrasco" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote: Dear, I understand your questions. I will prepare answers to clarify Doubts. regards Sent from my iPhone The 27/02/2017, at 09:40, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote: Huberto, I agree with Alexander. To complete the story, I think it should be clarified when the elections should have taken place reference, and the reasons why they were not realized. And also two schedules with dates, from the dates due done, considering alternative proposals. Thanks and best regards Alberto Soto lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] * * On behalf of Alejandro Pisanty * Sent: * Monday, February 27, 2017 12:34 AM * To: * Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> * CC: * lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org * Subject: * Re: [lac-discuss-en] Elections in May 2017 Humberto, thank you very much for this message. Before you can form an opinion is needed: 1. Explicitly mention dates and places of both ICANN meetings Instead of referring to them by number. What goes from 60 to 63 a year, right? 2.Explicitly mention the duration of the extension of mandate each means, and for whom. I repeat what I recently said: this is not only an administrative matter, is a possible extension of mandate it is also political. 3. Indicate what steps will continue the mediation process, in the same message. For many reasons it would be preferable for the new election out after we reach final agreements as a result of mediation, but there are also reasons to not wait, especially if the pending process is still long. Thanks again. Alejandro Pisanty 02/26/2017 21:12 GMT-06: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> : Dear members of LACRALO, We would like to ask your opinion on the regional electoral calendar LACRALO leaders. As previously stated, it would be very useful for the program Regional leadership LACRALO could be synchronized with the other RALOs and the ALAC. Do allow the NomCom know what ALAC and RALO leaders They would be in a leadership position chosen to take this into account when NomCom select charges. It would also allow staff At-Large support us more efficiently. Then two options are presented. We believe that both options must be voted by members of LACRALO. However, we would like to ask your opinion on which prefers its reasons for selecting option: * The first option is to hold elections in May with synchronization ICANN achieved in full 60 * In this case, the election of Regional Leadership should take place during May and not in February. Elected leaders would take their positions immediately after the close of the Annual General Meeting 2017 (ICANN 60). This would mean that the current President and the Secretary of LACRALO remain in office until ICANN 60. This would allow transition period if new leaders are chosen. Both leaders current as newcomers are supported to travel to the Assembly Annual general. * The second option is to hold elections in May with full ICANN synchronization achieved in 63 * In this case, the election of Regional Leadership should take place during May and not in February. LACRALO elected leaders take their positions immediately in June 2017. The newly elected leaders would take office on June 1, 2017 with a term of duration end at the Annual General Meeting of 2018 at ICANN 63.Support for travel to ICANN would begin in June 59 This is an interim solution where full synchronization occurs at ICANN 63. We would appreciate your opinion before 13 March 2017. After that, we will open a voting process to decide which is the best choice for our RALO. Regards, Humberto Carrasco - President Maritza Aguero - Secretary _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/15bdd349c8.html --]]