Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? 8859-1 q = iso-F3n Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 de_AT-Large_sobre_Modificaci = F3n_de_los_Estatutos_respecto = q = iso-8859-1 _de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =????
Sept. 8, 2014
6:55 p.m.
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? 8859-1 q = iso-F3n Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 de_AT-Large_sobre_Modificaci = F3n_de_los_Estatutos_respecto = q = iso-8859-1 _de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =???? From: vanda@uol.com.br Dear, I had already expressed my position counter 75% of the members for a refusal to proposals of Gac. Alexander will get going in the same direction. I be interesting to read The Economist - The Internet Power Vacuum Worsens (L-gordon-Crovitz-the-internet-power-vacuum-worsens-1410124265 <http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/l-gordon-crovitz-the-internet-power-vacuum-wo RSENS-1410124265? mobile & mg = y =-wsj reno64>) removing questions of critical internal politics of Democrats and Republicans x concentrating point in the actions of ICANN. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 On 9/8/14, 14:09, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote: > Alberto, all > > After the msa background to explore the subject of "GAC advice" on > Conversations with various people in the IGF, and other > Analysis, I have come to this conclusion: > > One. We must continue to put limits to the stealthy penetration of positions > Affected the control, and therefore specifically hold our position > About not increase the specific gravity of the quasi-veto opininy > GAC. > > 2. We may be losing sight of a key point of the proposal: > Explcitos votes in the GAC. The positions of the GAC so obliging > Special Board should have the vote counted. Otherwise estaramos > Contine to support a current bad situation. In sta, few > Governments may not impose a position that is offset by the > Majority.This seems to be the situation regarding .vin / .wine eg > To cite a particular case, that is not the only one. > > I propose to modify accordingly the text of our proposal > And actively drive change in the ALAC. > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > 8/23/2014 12:24 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> : > >> Dear, estbamos preparing our draft, but both Humberto How come >> >> I are working in coordination with Ftima (our ALAC Member). She >> We >> avisde herein, there was a small delay problem The >> Mailing list >> ALAC (technician problem), but aquest. So far >> all communications received in our Regin >>, >> Are coincident with statements in the document, as Alexander said, >> None in opposition. >> Therefore, we adopt the same as our opinion Of Regin, Staff >> solicitndole to their collaboration to be on the same wiki Published >> Manuscripts.This will level the playing field for all Our >> >> Documents are presented. Now we just >> accessing it on the wiki, and do the Suggestions >> Consider as >> convenient. Our comments received Sern Up >> >> September 3 at 20 UTC That >> Short link: http://goo.gl/XYt9FT >> Thank >> Ftima that allows us to demonstrate the coordinated work that Allows >> good things and save time and labor. Best regards >> !! >> Alberto Soto >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Fatima >> Cambronero >> >> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:01 pm >> To: LACRALO Espaol >> Subject: [lac-discuss-es] First Draft Declaration of At-Large About >> Modifying >> Statutes regarding considerations GAC >> Dear >> / os, >> >> >> As adelantLen >> yesterday in an email to this list, we have l i Worked as rapporteurs >> (pen holders) a declaration on this Case >> >> From ALAC. >> >> In this declaration >> We have considered the comments that have been LACRALO >> done since besides those coming from ALAC. >> >> This first draft >> declaration can be found at the following >> Link: >> >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaw S + C >> Regarding hanges >> + + Consideration + of + GAC + + Workspace Advice >> >> >> This first draft >> estabierto declaration to all comments At-Large >>. There is still time allotted for reviews. We will report here >> when that term is defined. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Fatima Cambronero >> >> >> >> - * >> * Fatima Cambronero Attorney-Argentina >> >> >> Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 >> Twitter:facambronero Skype >>: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list Lac-discuss->> es@atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> Http://www.lacralo.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list Lac-discuss->> es@atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> Http://www.lacralo.org >> >> > > > > - > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >Facultad de Química UNAM >Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, >http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >_______________________________________________ >lac-discuss-es mailing list >lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d092b647ff.html --]]
4284
Age (days ago)
4284
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
vanda＠uol.com.br