[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Net Neutrality From: apisan@unam.mx Sergio, This analysis is very interesting, not least because the arguments of a government ISP, a government that many understand anticapitalist, coincide with those of the US and European telcos. I have a first question about your text: Google, Netflix, Facebook, biuscadores ,, generators, distributors of content, social networking, etc., "do not pay a penny" by networks? Is that true? (Advance if someone suggested to take the discussion off LACRALO not be suitable forum ste ms estaratento the argument). Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Sergio Bronstein [bronstein.sergio@gmail.com] Posted on: Friday, February 27, 2015 7:06 To: Alberto Soto CC: LACRALO Espaol Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Net Neutrality Buenos das tod @ s It is absolutely true that our obligation as representatives of users is defending the right of free use of internet, but I risk to disagree on the concept of neutrality as estpensando today. I go to the concrete.Today, telco operators are investing networks on passing the content that users should have free access. Any study that is reviewed, demostrarque curve investments (fixed networks, mobile, equipment and software) that These companies make their networks (which must withstand every day ms transfer large files) estcerca to meet the revenue curve; in short, the "business" of the telco, such as esthoy, no sotiene. Meanwhile, there is a group of companies (search engines, generators, content distributors, social networks, etc., each das ms concentrated and powerful, who make it their business to travs networks by which do not pay a penny. Questions from users optics are then: 1. Who pagarpor networks in the future? The states? We must stop states say how much, when, where, what, a quin conectarny with qutarifas? 2.We must deliver operational and network expansion by the Google, Facebook, Netflix? And if it happens again ask to quin conectarna customers or users, they can pay or not. 3. Does Netflix and similar no charge for download content but not collaborate in the development of networks? how actuarn when adueen the operators? Our main lines of work should remain inclusion in its broader sense (ie, connectivity and knowledge for use), besides Free access and circulation of information, and in this sense, the question it will be: 4. New dueos of garantizarn networks that happen, or privilegiarna customers before users? I think if we do not have clear answers to these questions, our must be vigilant, lest it be that a small group of corporations business is to decide on our rights and freedoms. I leave for discussion, which ojalse of. Greetings to everyone s, Sergio Bronstein President Internauta Venezuela On 02/26/2015 21:21, "Alberto Soto" <asoto@ibero-americano.org> i wrote:

Es una medida que ojalá prospere y sea ejemplo para los gobiernos de nuestra Región:

http://goo.gl/Rjmc7H

Saludos cordiales

Alberto Soto

--- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. http://www.avast.com _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/61ec9203b2.html --]]