Gracias Harold por hacerlo de pronto.
Recuerdo a los colegas que hubo otra modificación de local para el último evento de ICANN este año. Así que va a ser en India, Hyderabad en sustitución a Puerto Rico.
Américas por lo tanto salieran de escena este año.
A mi ver, todo el proceso de rotación donde los meetings son alocados debe ser revisado; porque además del salto de las Americas este año, también hay la cuestión del modelo
B, que en principio debe focar en outreach + políticas de ICANN, y fue pensado para ocurrir en países pequeños y en desarrollo.
Vemos esta año Panamá fue sustituido por Finlandia, porque de ultima hora, aunque pequeña esta muy lejos de ser un país en desarrollo , pierde así la oportunidad de hacer
outreach efectivo en otro local en desarrollo.
Abrazos a todos
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159 # 1004
01311-200 – Sao Paulo/SP – Brazil
Phone: + 55 11 3266-6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181-1464
From:
<lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:22 PM
To: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Resoluciones del Board | Reunión Regular 15 mayo 2016
Estimadas y estimados
Reenvío la información compartida por Rinalia Abdul sobre las Resoluciones del Board alcanzadas en la reciente reunión del 15 mayo.
Algunos aspectos claves:
* Interesantes aspectos como la Mejora en la Apertura y Transparencia
* Comentarios Público sobre la revisión propuesta de Conducta en las Reuniones ICANN.
* Creación de un Grupo de Trabajo del Board sobre Gobernanza de Internet (incluyendo a Rinalia)
* Aprobación de los presupuestos de AC/SO tal como fue presentado por el Staff.
Temas en los cuales debemos involucrarnos e informar a nuestras ALSs a fin de construir entre todos la mejor ICANN posible para los tiempos venideros en medio del proceso de transición.
Saludos
Harold Arcos
ALAC Member - LACRALO
Presidente Internauta Venezuela
skp: harcos0912
+58 4129982820
15 May 2016
1.
Approval of Board Meeting Minutes
2.
Security & Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Appointment
§
Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.02
3.
GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Charter Amendments (2016)
§
Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.03
§
Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.04 – 2016.05.15.05
5.
Board Working Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG)
2.
Main Agenda:
§
Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.07 – 2016.05.15.08
3.
SO/AC FY17 Additional Budget Requests Approval
§
Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.09
4.
October 2016 ICANN Meeting Venue Contracting
§
Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.10 – 2016.05.15.11
5.
USG IANA Stewardship Transition – Additional FY16 Expenses and Funding
§
Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.12
6.
AOB
1.
Enhancing Openness and Transparency – Board Deliberations
§
Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.13 – 2016.05.15.14
3.
Executive Session – CONFIDENTIAL
Whereas, the Board believes that providing increased access to Board deliberations is important, and that increased openness is an important means of working toward that goal.
Whereas, the ICANN Board discussed at its Amsterdam workshop how to improve its functioning and agreed that enhancing the visibility into the Board deliberations and decision-making processes was an important part of becoming more
accountable and more transparent.
Whereas, the Board noted the call from the community for increased openness and transparency.
Whereas, the Board believes that a positive first step towards increased openness is publicly posting transcripts and/or recordings of its deliberative sessions to the extent that such information or dialogue is not subject to
confidentiality restrictions or privilege.
Resolved (2016.05.15.13), the Board directs the President and CEO, or his designee(s), to work with the Board to develop a proposed plan for the publication of transcripts and/or recordings of Board deliberative sessions, with
such plan to include an assessment of possible resources costs and fiscal impact, and draft processes to: (i) ensure the accuracy of the transcript; and (ii) for redaction of portions of the transcript that should be maintained as confidential or privileged.
Resolved (2016.05.15.14), the Board expects to evaluate the plan in Helsinki, and if satisfactory to begin testing of the proposed processes relating to publication of transcripts and/or recordings of the Board's deliberative sessions
as soon as practicable after Helsinki.
In support of the continued call for visibility into Board deliberations and processes, the Board has determined to make available transcripts or recordings, where appropriate, of the Board's deliberative sessions. This effort
to enhance openness is likely to also support the ICANN community in enhancing ICANN's accountability, as it will reduce questions of how and why the Board reaches its decisions. This decision also directly supports ICANN's previous efforts and the continued
goal of operating as openly and transparently in its decision-making. ICANN is also acting consistently with the ICANN's Bylaws, as set out in Article III, section 1 of the ICANN Bylaws, that, "ICANN and its constituent bodies shall operate to the maximum
extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness." (ICANN Bylaws at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en
- III.)
There will be issues before the Board for which confidentiality is still required, and that may require redaction of parts or withholding of full transcripts, and it is important that the community and the Board understand how
those decisions will be taken. To that end, the Board is directing the development of a plan, which would include proposed processes by which those redaction decisions for confidentiality and privilege are to be made. That plan should be developed as soon
as practicable, and should be ready for Board consideration during ICANN56 in Helsinki.
This decision will not have any impact on the security, stability or resiliency of the DNS. Implementation of this decision may involve increased costs, including, risk and fiscal impact for ICANN.
This is an organizational administrative function for which public comment is not required, but such input may be useful at a later point depending upon the plan.