[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Roosevelt: Algunos hechos no deben ser contradicha con éxito, Brotherman. Es innegable que tenemos varios casos en que las agrupaciones del Caribe y América Latina se han traducido en la marginación del Caribe. Usted nombró uno. Yo podría nombrar a otros. Pero como con todo otro hecho conocido, hay excepciones. Y la excepción siempre ha sido el resultado del liderazgo. Tome Hugo - puede que RIP - y la Alternativa Bolivariana como un ejemplo. Nunca tendría trabajó sin Chávez y su profunda comprensión y ferviente que tenemos problemas comunes para los que no pueden ser soluciones compartidas. Nunca fue trata de ser anti-americano como los principales medios de comunicación lo hizo. Él no era un hombre estúpido. Cuando nos planteamos LACRALO en Buenos Aires, lo hizo con la esperanza de que un organización dedicada a la gobernanza de Internet sería diferente. Esto fue la razón principal para exigir la toma de decisiones por consenso.Perdimos nuestro camino. Pero por un tiempo ahora, he sentido que podríamos estar en la a partir de una cierta madurez de la visión. Tengo la esperanza de que esto flor, da una oportunidad. No creo que LACRALO está solo con las tensiones. La diferencia es por otra RALOs, han logrado contener y mantenerlas viables. Hasta ahora. Yo No puedo ver lo que se ve, el abandono de los intereses del Caribe. Lo que vemos Es otra oportunidad y otro intento de participar en la mejora de nuestros intereses comunes. Vamos a darle una oportunidad. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El Martes, 19 de marzo 2013 a las 12:04 AM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> escribió:

I quite agree that the conversation is counter productive. Striking workers are counterproductive too and are meant to be, for the sake of impressing upon capital, the plight of the workers. We have given quality for too long, accommodating for too long and yet treated as though we are second class based upon an archaic or even fictional definition of democracy. It is like, democracy is about the rule of the majority, we are the majority and we really don't want to hear from the scraps.

Under these conditions, there will always be talk of two regions because one set of people will not sit and be dominated by another. Unless the Caribbean totally gives in to LA, there will always be talk of two regions and there will always be that distance between the two. My experience with the OAS and now this convinces me that LAC should never be.

I am watching how the Caribbean is giving in slowly but surely. Elections makes no sense for the Caribbean as we have been totally disenfranchised and all attempts to make the system more fair and just are opposed by LA. Anybody from the Caribbean running as Chairman? You think Lance will win this election for Secretary? Waste of time. How can LA claim to represent the Caribbean when they are suppressing the Caribbean? Makes no sense to me and if OAS is anything to go by, participation from the Caribbean will dwindle in LACRALO and that will suit LA just fine.

ROK

-----Original Message----- From: Lance Hinds Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:11 PM To: Jacqueline Morris Cc: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS

It is quite frankly counterproductive to continue this conversation about "2 sub regions". As Jacqueline says it is nothing more a distraction. We are going to have to work with each other and respect each other interests. Let us take advantage of the diversity that we have and the skills that each of us brings to the table. Someone spoke during the call about AFRALO. I have no doubt that they have internal issues as well, but certainly on the face of it they seem to work despite many the languages and cultural differences that they might have in that RALO. We can and should do much better. I think sometimes we forget who and what we are doing here.

My next two cents

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jacqueline Morris < jam@jacquelinemorris.com

...

wrote:

...

it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as identified here. On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia@internauta.org.ar> wrote:

...

-- Lance Hinds Chief Technology Officer BrainStreet Group 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana

This message contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential and is the property of BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning. The information contained herein is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it . If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or take any action in reliance to the contents of this information or any part thereof and it may be unlawful to do so. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message from your system. BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning are neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor any delay in its receipt. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6184 - Release Date: 03/17/13

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/caf4fd6da7.html --]]