I raised the issue during the to meeting work on Repertoire, as this group has yet not started its meetings, to devise principles for inclusion / exclusion, so ghat we should have solid grounds to include code points. Furthermore, some one has to present on behalf of the group, what we have done and what is the way forward.
Regarding my email containing draft principles, I wanted to communicate that before going for any strategy ( either inclusion of code ponits on the basis of language or on the basis of MSR) we should have principles for it. In my perception it would be easy to go for MSR is much easy as compared to languages, as it would take years to finish 180 languages.
It doesn't mean at all that we will start from zero, Marjina has already done most of the work, so we can quickly go through it and work on rest of the code points.
Best Regards,
Ahmed Bakht
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 at 3:52 pm, Textual Solutions
<textualsolutions@gmail.com> wrote: