Dear colleagues, 

I've been pulling together the list of variants due to underlining, and I noticed something.  In every case where we did a full group review of a letter with "circumflex below", the final decision was that it was a variant.  But there was one letter (D) which did not get a full group review because, by chance, both the original two reviewers were folks who consistently didn't see the circumflex below as a variant.  It seems to me that, as a matter of consistency, if we generally see a circumflex below as something that cannot be distinguished from the letter alone, we should revise the finding for D to conform. 

Does anyone have a problem with me making that addition?