Dear colleagues,
Mirjana¡¯s recent research on Montenegrin has raised some interesting issues.
One of them is diagraphs.
Currently we have digraphs like ©¡ and ©« in our repertoire, but Dutch ©¦ (U+0133) as in v©¦f ¡®five¡¯ is white in MSR-2 (not compatible with IDNA 2008). Certainly many digraphs,
including ©¦ are visually similar to their component letters. We could consider adding all digraphs to the list of criteria for exclusion, or adding them with exceptions (less good from a usability point of view). Incidentally, ©¬ and & are probably excluded
for other reasons, Longevity Principle and Punctuation, respectively.
What do you think?
Français: Qu¡¯est-ce qu¡¯on devrait faire avec les digraphs dans notre répertoire – les permettre ou pas?
Regards,
Chris.
==
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon