It is pretty clear, if one reads the MSR-3 document, that we are supposed to deal with Variants. Which include, but are NOT limited to, homoglyphs.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka@verisign.com>
To: Meikal Mumin <meikal@mumin.de>
Cc: "bill.jouris@insidethestack.com" <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>; Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland@knipp.de>; "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Latingp] Variant cross-script analysis worksheets

we must deal with such confusable characters or sequences of characters in the context of variants

No, we don’t. Confusability is not in scope. We established the Latin panel will deal with homoglyphs or nearly homoglyphs (i.e. font variation) in the context of cross-scripts.