I concur. Let’s focus on completing the task within our scope. Visually similarity is dealt by the String Similarity Review process.
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:59 AM, Michael Bauland <
Michael.Bauland@knipp.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
>
>> On 09.07.2018 19:11, Bill Jouris wrote:
>> For example, suppose we decide that a Cyrillic Small Letter Em (м
>> codepoint 043C) is NOT a variant of a Latin Small Letter M (m codepoint
>> 006D). Then it is possible to create a (Cyrillic) TLD of .сом, because
>> the last letter is visibly "different" from that in .com.
>
> as said earlier, I agree that having a TLD сом is definitely a problem
> and should not be allowed. But independent from our variant rules, such
> a TLD application would always be rejected.
>
> Therefore I agree with Mirjana: let's first concentrate on the task we
> have to do and then later we can look at further work that is nice to have.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________________
> | |
> | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
> ------- Technologiepark
> Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
> 44227 Dortmund
> Germany
>
> Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0
> Fax: +49 231 9703-200
> Dr. Michael Bauland SIP:
Michael.Bauland@knipp.de> Software Development E-mail:
Michael.Bauland@knipp.de>
> Register Court:
> Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
>
> Chief Executive Officers:
> Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp