Hi all,

 

This comment is for all data in the Appendix E which would need GP’s discussion on how to address the comment.

 

However, I’d like to draw your attention that code points mentioned (03CD and 00FA). These are already included in the variant set.

The final version of Appendix E after the public comment would require revision to remove the variant pairs.

 

Regards,

Pitinan

 

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mats Dufberg via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>
Reply-To: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>
Date: Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 4:43 AM
To: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Latingp] Another comment for Latin Proposal

 

This public comment is more challenging than the first one. :-)

 

 

Mats

 

-- 

---

Mats Dufberg

mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se

Technical Expert

Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation)

Mobile: +46 73 065 3899

https://internetstiftelsen.se/

 

 

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Reply to: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>
Date: Friday, 15 October 2021 at 20:28
To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] Another comment for Latin Proposal

 

 

https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposal-for-latin-script-root-zone-label-generation-rules-23-09-2021/submissions/naralo-14-10-2021