On Wednesday, August 28, 2019, 03:20:49 PM PDT, Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> wrote:

Dear colleagues,

I hope to be able to attend this week's meeting. However in case I get preempted, I've put together my current take on our spreadsheet for Sharp S.

For openers, here are my assumptions:

1. if a domain name including a Sharp S is legal, then it exists

2. if a domain name with a double S is legal, then it exists

3. a "failure of service" happens when the user enters a legal domain name, but gets a "Not found" response.

4. a "misconnection" occurs when the user enters a domain name, whether legal or not, and ends up at a different webpage. That is, one different from what he thought he wanted.

* :Maybe" because it still isn't absolutely clear whether, if the TLD is "allocatable", the domain name must be granted only to the holder of that domain name with the variant TLD.

-- if not, then misconnection is a problem. That is, it's a No.

-- if so, the only reason to have it is because the owner wants to do a redirect, so both names reach the same webpage. That is, it's a Yes.

Hoping to talk to you all tomorrow.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

On Wednesday, August 28, 2019, 08:08:37 AM PDT, Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs> wrote:

Dear GP members.

Please find enclosed the Agenda proposal for our next telephone conference. The agenda is the same as it was last five calls, only dates of calls are changed.

Any comments are welcome.

Pitinan will send the remainder on time.

All links to relevant working documents could be found at the end of this document in the section REMINDERS.

Regards Mirjana

___________________________________________

AGENDA for the GP call on August the 29^th, 2019, 16:00UTC

Roll call
Discussion on Dennis contribution Appendix: IDNA Compatibility – Latin Small Letter Sharp S (ß) 00DF [docs.google.com], IDNA2003 compatibility issues slides 8/1
Finalization of the topic “Sharp s vs ss”, page 61 in the Report
Stacking with combining diacritics - discussion
Next meeting proposal September the 5^th, 2019, 16:00UTC
AOB

REMINDERS

Latin GP – Report version 5 schedule
Meikal’s Template for Appendix D on Variants

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=10C636851F7DD403!612296&ithint=file%2cdocx&authkey=!AJa6cA3tJQ27DgI

Panel members contributions are in Appendix D

Apendix D Merger made by Meikal
Trello board with In-script analysis items
Bill’s table with code points collected for visual similarity analysis

https://www.dropbox.com/preview/Latin%20GP/InScriptVariants/Bill-%20In-ScriptVariantAnalysis-SimilarityReview.xlsx?role=personal
Bill’s finding on Stacking with Combining Diacritics (Attachment: Combining Diacritics and Stacking.pdf)

Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/preview/Latin%20GP/InScriptVariants/Bill-CombiningDiacriticsandStacking.docx?role=personal

Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GKJ-NF5MnRllFiz7iaa5hsmyNpg5oxPxqBl2MNtxV_Y/edit

Dennis contribution Appendix: IDNA Compatibility – Latin Small Letter Sharp S (ß) 00DF [docs.google.com]
IDNA2003 compatibility issues slides 8/1 produced by Dennis

_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.