Dear Mirjana, and all,

I used the word document to compare the version 6 and version 5 of the main document and provided the red-line version (proposal-latin-lgr-29apr21-v6-redline.docx) as attached.

It might be a little hard to see all changes as we have restructure some of the sections.

Therefore, here are the list of changes:

1. Adding 4 more code points to the repertoire from two languages (Serer, Kpelle)
   • 0260      ɠ             LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH HOOK         Kpelle
   • 0188      ƈ              LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH HOOK          Serer
   • 01A5      ƥ             LATIN SMALL LETTER P WITH HOOK          Serer    
   • 01AD     ƭ              LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH HOOK          Serer
2. With point #1:
   • Two references added for Serer and Kpelle language in the main document
   • Appendix B was updated with additional languages.
   • Appendix C was updated with additional code points.
3. Move the Variants Pairs Due to Transitivity to be section 6.5
4. Adding variant mapping for Latin Small Letter S (0073) and Malayalam Letter Tta (0D1F)
5. With point #5:
   • The code point sequence 0D1F 0D1F also added in the set of double S
   • Appendix D.7 Generic Glyphs was updated, Adding 0D1F to S-Shape set.
6. Other editorial changes.

In addition, the GP has conducted the additional variant set  based on the additional code points and the Malayalam Letter Tta. The analysis table has not been included in the version 6 yet. It might be useful to also share the analysis detail to the IP along with this message. Please find attached the sheet (Additional Variant Candidates.xlsx).

Kindly let us know if any further information should be included.

We are planning to share the message and the attachments with the IP on Tuesday 18 May.

Regards,

Pitinan

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sarmad Hussain via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>
Reply-To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 12:11 AM
To: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Latingp] [Ext] Re: Early feedback from IP

Sure Mirjana,

We can develop a draft for Latin GP to review.

Comparing document versions may not work as some sections were re-structured.  However, we will try to document all the changes from the previous version submitted to the IP.

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 9:39 PM
To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP

Dear Sarmad,

Is it possible that Pitinan provide such document. One possibility is to compare two documents and find differences. After that we can add rationale.  I shall not be available next Thursday for a meeting, I’ll be travelling.

Regards Mirjana

From: Latin GP <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Reply to: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 18:34
To: Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP

Dear Latin GP members,

Here is a request for IP. 

Before doing a more detailed review, the Integration Panel would like to receive a list of changes and their rationale from the previous version of the Latin LGR.

As the Latin LGR proposal does not have redline changes, developing a short document for identifying recent changes will help IP review the Latin GP proposal more effectively.

Regards,
Sarmad