Dennis,
I have to second Bill. I really do not understand what bullet 1 in slide 4 means. Please elaborate.
And when it comes to variants, I also question the requirement. That requirement is not used for Chinese variants.
Mats
---
Mats Dufberg
DNS Specialist, IIS
Mobile: +46 73 065 3899
https://www.iis.se/en/
From:
Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 23:57
To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Latingp] Cross-script analysis Armenian and Greek, and overview slides
In the Armenian/Latin table, line 39 (Armenian Letter Keh) by BJ+ is a typo on my part. Should
be BJ- of course. Or BJ#, since there is no Latin equivalent given. Sorry
I have a couple questions on Slide 4:
1) I am not clear what you are trying to say in point 1.
2) I do not believe that we actually agreed that only exact homoglyphs would be considered variants.
I know that this is *your* view. I just don't think is was anything resembling a consensus of the team. And conversations with the Integration Panel have made clear that it is not a mandate from them.
Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)
From:
"Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 2:32 PM
Subject: [Latingp] Cross-script analysis Armenian and Greek, and overview slides
Dear Latin GP variant team members,
Please find enclosed consolidated files for cross-script analysis for Armenian and Greek. We will be using these
files to finalize the work during our workshop.
Also, please review the slides and let me know if you have any feedback.
Thank you,
Dennis
_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp