Dear Colleagues,
Here are the minutes from last conference call. I am sending them inline and as an attachment.
All comments, suggestions, proposals are welcome.
Regards
Mirjana Tasic
_____________________________________________________________
Minutes from conference call on 27th of July, 2016
Conference call lasted about 40 minutes. Five GP members were on the call. The agenda was:
1.
Roll call
2. Review of current status
2a. Status of proposal
2b. Status of GP membership and identification of gaps in membership
3. Discussion on next steps
3a. Identification of tasks (updating the proposal document; increasing membership, others?)
3b. Strategies to address these tasks, working space (Googledocs, ICANN wiki space, something else)
3c. Assignment of tasks to different members
4. AOB
We have discussed some topics from the agenda, not all of them. The conclusions from the discussion are:
1.
The GP proposal has to be reedited. Sarmad volunteered to put the material, that we have in current proposal, in a new template as advised by IP. This will be new draft proposal, which will be discussed during
future conference calls.
2.
My proposal for the cooperation platforms is:
a.
All document that we have developed up to now has to be uploaded in our ICANNWIKI space. Every document could be downloaded from this platform for use on the local computer.
·
Sarmad can administer our wiki space
·
I will make the list of the documents we have and attach it at the end of this mail
·
ICANNWIKI link
https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP
b.
For the document which needs concurrent editing we could use GoogleDocs. This platform is taking care of different versions of the document.
It will be very practical that every Latin GP member has a Google account in order to log in while editing the document, so that every change made to the document is properly registered. Otherwise, editing and comments from people not logged in with his/her
Google account is marked as anonymous.
When one document is uploaded to Googledocs for further development, every Latin GP member will receive, in an e-mail, call for editing or commenting the document and a corresponding link. It is advisable first to log to Google with an account, then to resume
further actions on the document.
Any comments, corrections, new proposals for this topic is very welcome.
3.
All GP members, who are willing to commit some amount of their time to our cause, are politely asked to look at the following table, and to decide to which group of languages they could contribute.
|
NO |
Classification |
No of languages |
Population |
GP members expertise |
Comment |
|
1.
|
Afro-Asiatic |
4 |
42.103.900 |
|
|
|
2.
|
Austronesian |
42 |
289.345.146 |
|
|
|
3.
|
Creole |
13 |
12.040.180 |
|
|
|
4.
|
Indo-European |
41 |
1.359.804.062 |
|
|
|
5.
|
Mayan |
5 |
4.211.480 |
|
|
|
6.
|
Niger-Congo |
36 |
203.298.610 |
|
|
|
7.
|
Nilo-Saharan |
4 |
8.457.500 |
|
|
|
8.
|
Non grouped |
16 |
107.336.480 |
|
|
|
9.
|
Sino-Tibetan |
3 |
3.696.750 |
|
|
|
10.
|
Turkic |
9 |
156.055.170 |
|
|
|
11.
|
Uralic |
7 |
16.415.980 |
|
|
|
12.
|
|
180 |
2.202.765.258 |
|
|
Languages marked as non grouped are as follows:
|
|
Language |
ISO 639-3 |
Classification |
Population |
EGIDS |
Language map |
GP member |
|
1.
|
2.380 |
4 |
|
||||
|
2.
|
Pitjantjatjara. Pitjantjara |
2.660 |
4 |
|
|||
|
3.
|
Wa.Paruk. Baraog. Phalok. Praok. Standard Wa. Wa |
Austro-Asiatic. Mon-Khmer. Northern Mon-Khmer. Palaungic. Eastern Palaungic. Waic. Wa |
805.700 |
2 |
|
||
|
4.
|
680 |
4 |
|
||||
|
5.
|
Greenlandic Kalaallisut. Inuktitut. |
57.000 |
1 |
|
|||
|
6.
|
Shavante.Xavante. Akuên. Akwen. A’uwe Uptabi. A’we. Chavante. Crisca. Pusciti.
Shavante. Tapacua |
Jean. Central |
9.600 |
4 |
|
||
|
7.
|
Khoekhoe. Bergdamara. “Hottentot” (pej.). Khoekhoegowab.
Khoekhoegowap. Maqua. Nama. Namakwa. Naman. Namaqua. Tama. Tamakwa. Tamma |
251.000 |
4 |
|
|||
|
8.
|
2.000.000 |
2 |
|
||||
|
9.
|
Vietnamese. Annamese. Ching. Gin. Jing. Kinh. Viet |
Mandarin Chinese. Northern Dong |
73.600.000 |
1 |
|
||
|
10.
|
Miskito. Marquito. Mískitu. Miskuto. Mísquito. Mosquito |
183.000 |
2 |
|
|||
|
11.
|
1.430.000 |
2 |
|
||||
|
12.
|
200.000 |
3 |
|
||||
|
13.
|
Quechua. Runasimi .Qhichwa simi |
8.912.820 |
3 |
Bolivia. Peru. Ecuador. Colombia. Argentina |
|
||
|
14.
|
Zhuang.Nong |
14.936.200 |
3 |
|
|||
|
15.
|
Cubeo Cuveo Hehenawa Hipnwa Kobeua Kobewa Kubwa Pamiwa |
6260 |
3 |
|
|||
|
16.
|
grn |
4.939.180 |
1 |
Paragay |
|
||
|
|
|
16 |
|
107.336.480 |
|
|
|
List of working documents:
1.
Draft Panel Proposal v4 (uploaded)
2.
Language list appendix. Version 4 (uploaded)
3.
02-LanguageAZ-EGIDS-1-4-EGIDIS-sum
4.
03-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Population
5.
05-LatinLAnguages-EGIDS-1-4-AfroAsiatic
6.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Austonesian
7.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Creole
8.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Indo-European
9.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Mayan
10.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Niger-Congo
11.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Nilo-Saharan
12.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-NotGrouped
13.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Sino-Tibetan
14.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Turkic
15.
05-LatinLanguages-EGIDS-1-4-Uralic