My part of Action item 3 enclosed.

From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 9:10 AM
To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>
Cc: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Fahd Batayneh <fahd.batayneh@icann.org>, Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Latin GP weekly meeting

Dear Latin GP members,

This is a gentle reminder for the weekly Latin GP meetings on Thursdays 30 May 2019, at 16:00 UTC.

Please note the message and agenda from Mirjana below:

I am asking you all to fill your findings on non-visual analysis of Latin code points in template for Appendix D[onedrive.live.com]. You should download tempate, fill it with your analysis and send it to Latin GP mail. We need this step so that these findings could be inserted in Final Report. If you forgot where are your findings, you can find links to your documents in REMAINDERS section item no 3.

Also, you can find links for all relevant working documents either in Action items table or at the end of this document in the section REMINDERS.

Regards Mirjana

___________________________________________

AGENDA for the GP call on May the 30^th , 2019, 16:00UTC

1. Roll call

2. URL underlining analysis – quick review of spread sheets provided by Bill

3. Final Report review – resolution of comments and remarks

4. Next meeting proposal June the 8^th, 2019, 16:00

5. AOB

Action items from previous calls

	ACTION ITEM	STATUS
1.	Complete URL Underlining Analysis Send spreadsheet with analysis for review by IP Focus on clear-cut cases, but make a call for other cases as well Consider incorporating “q” vs “g” in similarity section; mention URL underlining case Bear in mind effect of transitivity when defining variants Cedilla and Comma Below have historic relationship; good candidate for variants (even without URL underlining)	1. Dennis started 2. Meikal and Bill should provide table based on Denis proposal for further investigation of underlining-RESOLVED 3. Meikal an Bill offered excel sheets for evaluation 4. Table for rating underlined code points is HERE [docs.google.com] 5. All members to put marks in this table 6. Bill summarized inspection of code points 7. Panel review of code points with inconsistent eveluation 8. Panel agreed to give all members the oportunity to challenge rating til May the 27^th.. After that Bill volunteered to make two spradsheets: first [docs.google.com] with agreed variants, the second [docs.google.com] with code points to be further investigated. 9. ALL - Review the sheets produced by Bill
2.	Create clear guidelines for variant definition that can be used as references in the proposal	1.Dennis, Meikal, Bill 2. ALL-Resolve comments in Final Report
3.	Review “base character” analysis per assignments finish reviewing previous work	Finished reports could be found HERE [dropbox.com] Cannot find reports from Mats and Denis
4.	Further input on German Eszett by German Registries	Michael. Text added in Final Report ALL-Resolve comments in Final Report
5.	Write-up proposal to include 00B7 (Middle Dot) to support “l·l” (letter L + Middle Dot + letter L) for Catalan language --	Michael, results from discussion with IP Short report on this action is included in Final report
6.	Develop test label strategy	Mirjana gave Proposal[docs.google.com] Sarmad and Pitinan provided test labels for Repertoire [drive.google.com] Test labels for variants should be provided
7.	Create test cases for dotless I vis-a-vis IDNA 2003 Compatibility issues	Mats
8.	Complete section for IDNA2003 compatibility issues in next version	Denis provided Appendix: IDNA Compatibility - Latin Small Letter Sharp S (ß) 00DF [docs.google.com] To be reviewed by Panel
9.	Maintenance of list of cases for additional similarity review	1. Bill.-Table could be found HERE[dropbox.com] 2. What are next steps?
10.	Bill’s finding on Stacking with Combining Diacritics (Attachment: Combining Diacritics and Stacking.docx)	1. Bill- Text could be found HERE[dropbox.com] 2. Problem should be discussed by Panel
11.	In script analysis on visual ground	NOT STARTED YET
12.	Discussion on filling final report with results of our analysis of In-script Non-Visual Variant Discovery Analysis. Maikal gave the suggestion in Appendix D. We should decide how to fill final report with our results.	The problem was discussed and Meikal provided template for Appendix D [onedrive.live.com] . Template was accepted by panel.
13.	Filling Appendix D template [onedrive.live.com]with findings from non-visual analysis. Contributions are in Appendix D [drive.google.com]	1. Finished : Mirjana, Meikal, Michael 2. Expecting (Mats, Bill, Denis, Hazzem)
14.	Wordmark.it users, who needs them