Sure Mirjana,

We can develop a draft for Latin GP to review.

Comparing document versions may not work as some sections were re-structured.  However, we will try to document all the changes from the previous version submitted to the IP.

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 9:39 PM
To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP

Dear Sarmad,

Is it possible that Pitinan provide such document. One possibility is to compare two documents and find differences. After that we can add rationale.  I shall not be available next Thursday for a meeting, I’ll be travelling.

Regards Mirjana

From: Latin GP <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Reply to: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 18:34
To: Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP

Dear Latin GP members,

Here is a request for IP. 

Before doing a more detailed review, the Integration Panel would like to receive a list of changes and their rationale from the previous version of the Latin LGR.

As the Latin LGR proposal does not have redline changes, developing a short document for identifying recent changes will help IP review the Latin GP proposal more effectively.

Regards,
Sarmad