No disagreement there. The HTML output is derived from the XML, which takes the input from the proposal word doc. But that’s kind of by design.
My point is that there are pairs of variant relationships not identified in the proposal word doc (explicitly or by transitivity), but found them in the HTML version. Which leads me to belief they were input my mistake.
Hope that clarifies the issue.
Thanks,
Dennis
From:
Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>
Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:28 PM
To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] XML and HTML of Latin LGR for version 6
|
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. |
Dear colleagues,
I feel quite strongly that we should keep the HTML and XML versions of our work in sync. That is, if the HTML text says that a pair of code points are variants, the XML version should say the same. If the XML version gives a pair as variants, the HTML version should also list them.
That being the case, I would note that we had a rather extended discussion on the topic of the Variants Due to Transitivity section. Our conclusion was that we should include the specific cases of cross-script variants for the Greek beta. Even though neither of the code points are in the Latin script.
Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)
On Wednesday, April 7, 2021, 11:47:15 AM PDT, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote:
Pitinan,
Thank you for putting this together. I have a few observations:
1. Assuming the HTML version is consistent with the XML version of the proposal, there are a number of variant relationships that (IMO) do not belong in the Latin GP proposal. These would be appropriate for the merged version of the RZ-LGR, however. There are various examples, but I can list a few: Variant Set 1 (0061-03AC), Variant Set 8 (00EF-03AF), Variant Set 48 (025B-03AD). My gut feeling is that we are picking up those pairs from the Greek proposal. If so, they should be removed from the Latin-specific proposal.
2. Variant Set 18: I think we are missing 01DF 01DF – 00DF, and 0455 0455 – 00DF. And others to round up a well behaved variant set, but once the former pairs are input into the tool, those should be populated automagically.
3. Variant Set 34: instead of “glyphs nearly identical…” it should read “homoglyph”.
4. The Variant Type labels are not being used consistently. There are parts where “r-eszett” is used, and in others it is referred to “r-german”.
5. Typo in Dotless I paragraph. Last sentence reads “total of up to four allocatable labels”. I think this meant to say “two allocatable labels”.
Best,
Dennis
From:
Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>
Reply-To: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>
Date: Monday, April 5, 2021 at 2:30 PM
To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] XML and HTML of Latin LGR for version 6
|
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. |
Dear Latin GP members,
Please find attached the updated XML and HTML files, in this version, the four code points from Serer and Kpelle also included in the repertoire.
The files are dated 13apr21 as it might be the expected date that the GP would agree to share the updated version to the IP.
Kindly review the files along with other document in One Drive and let us know any feedback.
Regards,
Pitinan
From:
Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>
Reply-To: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>
Date: Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 12:01 AM
To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] XML and HTML of Latin LGR for version 6
Dear Latin GP,
Based on the current working version of the proposal, we have prepared the XML file accordingly.
Please find attached the files for your review.
List of attachments:
1. The Latin LGR in XML (proposal-latin-lgr-02apr21-en.xml)
2. The Latin LGR in HTML (proposal-latin-lgr-02apr21-en.html)
Please review and let us know any feedback, we plan to share these files to the IP along with the proposal package once it is finalized.
Regards,
Pitinan
_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).
You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.