Hi Daniel,

In the Armenian/Latin table, line 39 (Armenian Letter Keh) by BJ+ is a typo on my part. Should be BJ- of course. Or BJ#, since there is no Latin equivalent given. Sorry

I have a couple questions on Slide 4:

1) I am not clear what you are trying to say in point 1.

2) I do not believe that we actually agreed that only exact homoglyphs would be considered variants. I know that this is *your* view. I just don't think is was anything resembling a consensus of the team. And conversations with the Integration Panel have made clear that it is not a mandate from them.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)

From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 2:32 PM
Subject: [Latingp] Cross-script analysis Armenian and Greek, and overview slides

Dear Latin GP variant team members,

Please find enclosed consolidated files for cross-script analysis for Armenian and Greek. We will be using these files to finalize the work during our workshop.

Also, please review the slides and let me know if you have any feedback.

Thank you,

Dennis

_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp