Can we justify the inclusion of Esperanto based on the principles or should we included because IP thinks it should be included?

Mats

---

Mats Dufberg

DNS Specialist, IIS

Mobile: +46 73 065 3899

https://www.iis.se/en/

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>
Date: Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 01:05
To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] Codepoints from Esperanto

The following code points occur in Esperanto, but are not previously included in our Repertoire:

Unicode Glyph Unicode Name 0109 ĉ Latin Small Letter C with Circumflex 011D ĝ Latin Small Letter G with Circumflex 0125 ĥ Latin Small Letter H with Circumflex 0135 ĵ Latin Small Letter J with Circumflex 016D ŭ Latin Small Letter U with Breve

In addition, we had included
015D ŝ Latin Small Letter S with Circumflex

This in our repertoire, but the only example was from Tswa, which is EGIDS 5 -- which the IP apparently doesn't consider sufficient for inclusion.  So we may want to modify the entry to reflect Esperanto there.

Bill Jouris
Inside Products
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com
831-659-8360
925-855-9512 (direct)