Dear colleagues,

Sorry for missing last weeks meeting. As Michael wrote on the list, it was a public holiday. 

I was reading the written summary and noticed the following:

„It was agreed that as the underlining was no longer relevant, therefore the transitivity mapping for SS with below diacritic with Sharp S will be removed.“

This is not meant in the sense that it does impact the general variant relationship between ss and sharp s - or is it?

Best,

Meikal
Am 28. Mai 2020, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>:

Dear All,

 

Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 21 May 2020.

Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions.

 

S. No.

Action Items

Owner

1

Conduct the dotless I test case in a locale tr_TR machine

PK

2

Start the Google Document for drafting the underlining analysis text

MD

 

The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at

 https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP.

 

Regards,

Pitinan

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Latingp mailing list
Latingp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.