Dear All,

In accompany with the Word Document proposal, I have updated the XML accordingly. Please find attached the XML which will also be sent to the IP to assist the reviewing process.

Kindly review and let us know any feedback.

There are issues I found while updating the XML. I listed the issues below, as well as in the attached file.

If the time allow, I’d like to request to add reviewing this note on the next Latin GP meeting agenda.

Regards,

Pitinan

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Note from updating the XML based on the Latin GP proposal version 6.3, date: 2020-01-08

1. Section 6.5.1 Breve and Caron. 0115 is mapped to 011B. However, 0115 is not in the repertoire.

Latin Small Letter E with Breve

0115

ĕ

↔

ě

011B

Latin Small Letter E with Caron

Blocked

Current version of XML has note included this mapping.

Kindly confirm which option to proceed:

1. Add 0115 into the repertoire. This case must include languages and reference.
2. Remove this 0115 <-> 011B mapping

2. Section 6.5.5 Dot Above and Hook Above. The code point for Latin Small Letter I should be changed to 0069

Latin Small Letter I

0117 0069

i

↔

ỉ

1EC9

Latin Small Letter I with Hook Above

Blocked

                This is already fixed in the XML

3. The following pair appear in two places. 6.5.7 Acute and Grave, and 6.5.9 Misc. I would suggest removing this from generic Misc. section.

Latin Small Letter O with Circumflex and Acute

1ED1

ố

↔

ồ

1ED3

Latin Small Letter O with Circumflex and Grave

Blocked

                Not affect XML.

4. Section 6.6.1 Underlining. The following two line are redundant. The second line should be removed. It contains wrong code point and empty glyph of Latin Small Letter E with Ogonek.

0065	e	Latin Small Letter E	0119	ê	Latin Small Letter E with Ogonek	YES	Blocked	Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining
0065	e	Latin Small Letter E	0019		Latin Small Letter E with Ogonek	YES	Blocked	Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining

                Current version of XML mapped only the first pair

From: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>
Date: Friday, January 10, 2020 at 19:02
To: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Cc: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Latingp] FOR IP: Latin GP Report draft version on January 8th, 2020

Thank you Mirjana, Latin GP members, for putting together this Latin RZ-LGR proposal version so timely.

We have shared it with the IP members.

Regards,
Sarmad

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>
Date: Friday, January 10, 2020 at 1:51 AM
To: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>
Cc: Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>
Subject: [Latingp] FOR IP: Latin GP Report draft version on January 8th, 2020

Dear IP

Latin GP is submitting last interim draft Report for your consideration and comments. Latin GP wants to give you some additional explanations about this Report:

1. Latin GP included all analysis  for In-script variant analysis which have been done since the previous version of the report in Appendix D.
2. Results of the analysis in Appendix D are just presented at this point.  Some results are inserted in the main part of the Report, but everything will  be discussed by GP for final conclusions.
3. Appendix E: Variant Relationship Mapping for “ss” and “s”  is added. This is intended for use when addressing the issue of variants for Sharp S (ß). 

We have received your document Partial IP Response to Latin LGR Update-v1.1 and we  thank you for it. Latin GP is discussing the issues raised and preparing  our response.  When the document is ready, we shall share it with you.

Regards Latin GP