Dear GP members,

Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our call. Any comments, corrections and suggestions are welcome.

Regards Mirjana

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

AGENDA for the GP call on April the 16^th     2020, 16:00UTC

1. Roll call
2. Discuss Appendix D cases which the first reviewer proposed variants (7 cases).

   (7) D.4.16 Circumflex Above + Grave Above

3. D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota

4. Discuss Appendix D next cases, Pitinan will prepare the document for discussion

5. Status of Generic glyphs analysis
6. Skip-ink  underlining Analysis how to proceed
7. AOB

Material for D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota

From the Report:

Cross-Script variant proposal

Latin Small Letter Iota	0269	ɩ	↔	ւ	0582	Armenian Small Letter Yiwn	Blocked	Glyphs nearly identical due to font design
Latin Small Letter I	0069	i	↔	і	0456	Cyrillic Small Letter Belarusian-Ukrainian I	Blocked	Homoglyph
Latin Small Letter Dotless I	0131	ı	↔	ι	03B9	Greek Small Letter Iota	Blocked	Homoglyph
Latin Small Letter Iota	0269	ɩ	↔	ι	03B9	Greek Small Letter Iota	Blocked	Homoglyph

In-Script variant proposal

Latin Small Letter Dotless I

0131

ı

↔

ɩ

0269

Latin Small Letter Iota

Blocked

In-script variant due to transitivity relationship of 03B9 Greek Small Letter Iota [BJ – move to Transitivity Section 6.7]

Latin Small Letter I	0069	i	↔	ỉ	1EC9	Latin Small Letter I with Hook Above	Blocked	6.5.5 Dot above and hook above in In-script  variant analysis
Latin Small Letter Dotless I	0131	ı	↔	ɩ	0269	Latin Small Letter Iota	Blocked	6.5.9. Misc in In-script variant analysis

0069	i	Latin Small Letter I	0069 + 0331	i̲	Latin Small Letter I + Combining Macron Below	YES	Blocked	Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining
0069	i	Latin Small Letter I	1ECB	ị	Latin Small Letter I with Dot Below	YES	Blocked	Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining