For the variant group: I have completed my analysis, both my primary and my secondary (where Bill's is the primary). I am still confused of the codes. MD+ means that I think they should be variants. MD-, MD# and MD* means that I do not think so but in different situations? In some cases I have updated the data of Bill's analysis (but in a separate file with my tag "MD" and a date on). Mats --- Mats Dufberg DNS Specialist, IIS Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://www.iis.se/en/
For the variant group: After some feedback from Michael I have slightly updated my review plus defined how I use MD{+,-,#,*}: * MD#: there is no Latin character to compare with * MD+: the Latin character is a candidate for being a variant, independent if the character is part of MSR or the Latin GP repertoire. * MD-: there is a similar character, but too different to be a candidate. * MD*: unsure if MD+ or MD-. When I have changed the character in what was Bill's original analysis, then I have set the background to be yellow. Yours, Mats --- Mats Dufberg DNS Specialist, IIS Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://www.iis.se/en/ From: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@iis.se> Date: Wednesday 17 January 2018 at 13:58 To: Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: Variant analysis Latin Armenian For the variant group: I have completed my analysis, both my primary and my secondary (where Bill's is the primary). I am still confused of the codes. MD+ means that I think they should be variants. MD-, MD# and MD* means that I do not think so but in different situations? In some cases I have updated the data of Bill's analysis (but in a separate file with my tag "MD" and a date on). Mats --- Mats Dufberg DNS Specialist, IIS Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://www.iis.se/en/
participants (1)
-
Mats Dufberg