Hi Dennis,  Actually, we were asked about Second Level.  And had a meeting to discuss our response.  I realize that you did not attend that final meeting of the Panel.  But we were asked.  And did respond as indicated.  Perhaps you could check the recording of the meetimg.  Bill  Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 6:50 AM, Tan Tanaka, Dennis<dtantanaka@verisign.com> wrote: <!--#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 p.yiv6917195367MsoNormal, #yiv6917195367 li.yiv6917195367MsoNormal, #yiv6917195367 div.yiv6917195367MsoNormal {margin:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv6917195367 a:link, #yiv6917195367 span.yiv6917195367MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6917195367 p.yiv6917195367msonormal, #yiv6917195367 li.yiv6917195367msonormal, #yiv6917195367 div.yiv6917195367msonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv6917195367 span.yiv6917195367apple-converted-space {}#yiv6917195367 span.yiv6917195367EmailStyle28 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv6917195367 .yiv6917195367MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv6917195367 filtered {}#yiv6917195367 div.yiv6917195367WordSection1 {}--> Hi Bill,   Our task was to develop rules for the root zone. Second level rules were out of scope, so I don’t believe the panel made any recommendations to that effect.   Best, Dennis   From:Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 12:33 AM To: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>, Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>, Michael Karakash <michael.karakash@icann.org>, Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com>, 'Meikal Mumin' <meikal@mumin.de>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Mondini <chris.mondini@icann.org>, Naela Sarras <naela.sarras@icann.org>, Rodrigo De La Parra <rodrigo.delaparra@icann.org>, Jia Rong Low <jiarong.low@icann.org>, Baher Esmat <baher.esmat@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] [Request for Input] (Latin GP) Public comment for additional and updated reference LGRs   | Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.  | Dear colleagues,     At our last meeting, my recollection is that we decided that, for Second Level Domain Names, the variant sets should be expanded to include those pairs for which 3 of us (rather than 5) had favored designation of variant status.  This because, unlike Top Level Domain Names, there can be no manual review of SLDs.  I see no sign that this has been recognized in the Second-Level Reference Label Generation Rules here.    I will be putting in a comment to that effect.  But I wonder if we might wish to make the point as a group.    Bill Jouris      Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android   On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:14 PM, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: Dear Latin GP members,   The Second-Level Reference Label Generation Rules (Reference LGRs) for Seven additional scripts (Armenian, Cyrillic, Greek,Latin, Japanese, Korean, and Myanmar) and other updated Reference LGRs are being released for Public Comment at https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/additional-script-based-r....   Reference LGRs help improve the transparency and consistency of the Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) table review process and facilitate the registry operations of new gTLDs which offer IDN registration in these languages and scripts. Input from relevant language and script user community is very important to finalize these Reference LGRs.   We’d like to draw you attention to review these Reference LGRs, especially the ones listed in the table below.   | Language/Script | LGR for Review | Update from previous version* | New or Substantial Change | | Belarusian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. Blocked variants have been added for homoglyphs of ASCII letters. These have no effect unless the LGR is used together with LDH labels in the same zone. | Yes | | Bosnian (Latin) Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Bulgarian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated.   Blocked variants have been added for homoglyphs of ASCII letters. These have no effect unless the LGR is used together with LDH labels in the same zone. | Yes | | Danish Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML]   | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | English Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated.   Based on further review in connections with updates to the reference LGR for the French language, the addition of fallback variants between letters with diaeresis and their ASCII base letters appears indicated. These variants are enabled here by default but are marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate them if required.   | Yes | | Finnish Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML]   | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | French Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML]   | Unicode Version has been updated.   The  U+00F1 (ñ) LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE has been changed from “extended-cp” to “included” by default.   The fallback variants between French letters with diacritics and their ASCII base letters are included. These variants are enabled here by default but are marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate them if required.   | Yes | | German Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated.   Variant for U+00DF (ß) has been defined to theLain RZ-LGR. This fallback variant is enabled here by default but is marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate it if required.   | Yes | | Hungarian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Icelandic Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Italian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Latin Script | Version 1 [HTML,XML] | N/A (New)   Compared to that source (Latin RZ-LGR), the repertoire has been further augmented with a code point sequence for the Catalan Ela Geminada: U+006C U+00B7 U+006C (l·l). As part of that sequence one additional Common script code point is available: U+00B7 (·).   There are two in-script sequences that do not add to the set of valid labels under this LGR but are defined for use in variants.   | Yes | | Latvian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Lithuanian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Norwegian Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Polish Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Portuguese Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Spanish Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | | Swedish Language | Version 3 [HTML,XML] | Unicode Version has been updated. | No | *The Unicode version of all Reference LGRs have been updated to version 11.0.0 to match the Maximal Starting Repertoire version 5 (MSR-5).   It will be highly appreciated if you could provide your feedback by Friday, 3 March 2023.   If we can be any of assistant for you to review these Reference LGRs, please don’t hesitate to let us know.   Best Regards,   Pitinan Kooarmornpatana IDN Program, Senior Manager ICANN       _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Dear all, There was a meeting to review the draft reference LGR on 25 Aug 2022. The attendee were: Bill, Hazem, Mirjana, Michael. It was an informal meeting beyond the scope of RZ-LGR work, therefore, during the meeting it was decided the recording was not needed. Here is the summary notes from the meeting on 25 Aug 2022. * Additional digits and hyphen in the repertoire was agreed. * It was agreed to add a sequence of l·l (006C 00B7 006C) * add a variant of l·l (006C 00B7 006C) and l-l(006C 002D 006C). l·l --> l-l is allocatable. l-l --> l·l is blocked. * add relevant rules to limit the number of allocatable variant labels due to the additional code point sequences. * It was discussed if the second-level should expand the variant sets threshold can be changed from 5 out of 7 to 3 out of 7. We have incorporated the first point in the public comment version, for the second point, we look forward to further input from broader community via public comment platform. It might be useful reach out directly to difference SOs/ACs or other organizations and invite them to provide their comments. If you could suggest who we should reach out to directly, kindly let us know. Best Regards, Pitinan From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka@verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 12:27 AM To: "b_jouris@yahoo.com" <b_jouris@yahoo.com>, "bill.jouris@insidethestack.com" <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>, "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>, "Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs" <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Michael Karakash <michael.karakash@icann.org>, "meikal@mumin.de" <meikal@mumin.de>, "mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se" <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, "hhezzah.las@gmail.com" <hhezzah.las@gmail.com> Subject: [Ext] Re: Re: [Latingp] [Request for Input] (Latin GP) Public comment for additional and updated reference LGRs Removing non-panel members. Thanks, Bill. What I meant is that the work of the panel i.e., the proposal, did not contain any recommendations pertaining to second level LGRs. The last meeting on record (per the wiki) is the one of 24 January 2022, which I attended, but the topic in question was not discussed. Could you or someone point me to the notes or recordings to the meeting in which second level guidance was deliberated? I may have indeed missed it because I couldn’t find any record beyond 24 Jan. Thank you, Dennis From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Reply-To: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 10:21 AM To: Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>, "bill.jouris@insidethestack.com" <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com>, "pitinan.koo@icann.org" <pitinan.koo@icann.org>, "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>, "Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs" <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, "michael.karakash@icann.org" <michael.karakash@icann.org>, "meikal@mumin.de" <meikal@mumin.de>, "mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se" <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, "hhezzah.las@gmail.com" <hhezzah.las@gmail.com> Cc: "chris.mondini@icann.org" <chris.mondini@icann.org>, "naela.sarras@icann.org" <naela.sarras@icann.org>, "rodrigo.delaparra@icann.org" <rodrigo.delaparra@icann.org>, "jiarong.low@icann.org" <jiarong.low@icann.org>, "baher.esmat@icann.org" <baher.esmat@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] [Request for Input] (Latin GP) Public comment for additional and updated reference LGRs Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Dennis, Actually, we were asked about Second Level. And had a meeting to discuss our response. I realize that you did not attend that final meeting of the Panel. But we were asked. And did respond as indicated. Perhaps you could check the recording of the meetimg. Bill Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1FJzPaNESPGaqHJV3WYC...> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 6:50 AM, Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com> wrote: Hi Bill, Our task was to develop rules for the root zone. Second level rules were out of scope, so I don’t believe the panel made any recommendations to that effect. Best, Dennis From: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 12:33 AM To: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org>, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org>, Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>, Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>, Michael Karakash <michael.karakash@icann.org>, Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com>, 'Meikal Mumin' <meikal@mumin.de>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Mondini <chris.mondini@icann.org>, Naela Sarras <naela.sarras@icann.org>, Rodrigo De La Parra <rodrigo.delaparra@icann.org>, Jia Rong Low <jiarong.low@icann.org>, Baher Esmat <baher.esmat@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] [Request for Input] (Latin GP) Public comment for additional and updated reference LGRs Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear colleagues, At our last meeting, my recollection is that we decided that, for Second Level Domain Names, the variant sets should be expanded to include those pairs for which 3 of us (rather than 5) had favored designation of variant status. This because, unlike Top Level Domain Names, there can be no manual review of SLDs. I see no sign that this has been recognized in the Second-Level Reference Label Generation Rules here. I will be putting in a comment to that effect. But I wonder if we might wish to make the point as a group. Bill Jouris Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/112ERjLOdRWykatymJ1s...> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:14 PM, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: Dear Latin GP members, The Second-Level Reference Label Generation Rules (Reference LGRs) for Seven additional scripts (Armenian, Cyrillic, Greek, Latin, Japanese, Korean, and Myanmar) and other updated Reference LGRs are being released for Public Comment at https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/additional-script-based-r... [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1LFz4_uqLBshqsLzouNK...>. Reference LGRs help improve the transparency and consistency of the Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) table review process and facilitate the registry operations of new gTLDs which offer IDN registration in these languages and scripts. Input from relevant language and script user community is very important to finalize these Reference LGRs. We’d like to draw you attention to review these Reference LGRs [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1kX3BdAdjSEddgMcwCut...>, especially the ones listed in the table below. Language/Script LGR for Review Update from previous version* New or Substantial Change Belarusian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1WUk6KzqkV3GVHXSJ4lg...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1NmuvapYzd4ErLKMyFjc...>] Unicode Version has been updated. Blocked variants have been added for homoglyphs of ASCII letters. These have no effect unless the LGR is used together with LDH labels in the same zone. Yes Bosnian (Latin) Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/16Gcuv5EavHw5qag5GFx...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/193H9RS77HiI5bNL2W14...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Bulgarian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1cVIFXekv9TLQhj52tVv...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1sjKVX3XdSFpDHx4G_-Q...>] Unicode Version has been updated. Blocked variants have been added for homoglyphs of ASCII letters. These have no effect unless the LGR is used together with LDH labels in the same zone. Yes Danish Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1yMAjQpnjemDkrK3ThWR...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1myICOAnTKF_UgX1dN73...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No English Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1Dz7h19nvlS5wtidDP9x...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/11IeSKwxlrTg4REJZAm_...>] Unicode Version has been updated. Based on further review in connections with updates to the reference LGR for the French language, the addition of fallback variants between letters with diaeresis and their ASCII base letters appears indicated. These variants are enabled here by default but are marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate them if required. Yes Finnish Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/10s-gns7JdkCCZsq6jbj...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1jyHVAtwQqDAXHbtz7aR...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No French Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1yzG_OA69Bt_YOWvNeKu...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1JM3ICIYmBLR2K91qWsC...>] Unicode Version has been updated. The U+00F1 (ñ) LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE has been changed from “extended-cp” to “included” by default. The fallback variants between French letters with diacritics and their ASCII base letters are included. These variants are enabled here by default but are marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate them if required. Yes German Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1cBiAWTxbwDFea95Xofe...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1QZGHb-10PTrCCmla-Wk...>] Unicode Version has been updated. Variant for U+00DF (ß) has been defined to the Lain RZ-LGR [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1WFKnXbDu43LuT_Z5aGN...>. This fallback variant is enabled here by default but is marked as “enabled” to allow registries to deactivate it if required. Yes Hungarian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1ZdFpXSA3o7voflFXRwp...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1KR72D3qqhdyTRVEjsq4...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Icelandic Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1v1Ev2YOXQ1Scy6yCIhk...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1yjOcmJQqv5HB3SyXQVR...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Italian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1eTBp8LytlkCmf5WMxjZ...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/16cd7Z5MoFWaa2_9FYmG...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Latin Script Version 1 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1UKHdQdU63E-uELOQc-g...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1V1QtviPVPd9rfkn5dUn...>] N/A (New) Compared to that source (Latin RZ-LGR), the repertoire has been further augmented with a code point sequence for the Catalan Ela Geminada: U+006C U+00B7 U+006C (l·l). As part of that sequence one additional Common script code point is available: U+00B7 (·). There are two in-script sequences that do not add to the set of valid labels under this LGR but are defined for use in variants. Yes Latvian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1R0jf8rGTXJ6dbLsg-NW...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1BhyfOO57mdm01ns-yqF...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Lithuanian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1ytfyHDv8oDguwi0_3FD...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1t9G-7i9TdhFBLHJc1ao...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Norwegian Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/14eIdczw1BF0O6AlA4fc...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1VXaJGrrprr2TNGn-4tw...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Polish Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1WCi1gQJZ3_Owf7ExC4A...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/18YjJJxZU9KqYZu7AIEI...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Portuguese Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1-M_eoRzsLNevkcIXw0Z...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1PkC-FJuXYSiwScvHzDV...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Spanish Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1rBnozZlb7fnaGc0ZUoJ...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1nr0gLAEAx_XzEvr2iTx...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No Swedish Language Version 3 [HTML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1tFeLVvZGKzKbsvLHh4R...>, XML [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1lggMYpGFZ9ocsvz-WAI...>] Unicode Version has been updated. No *The Unicode version of all Reference LGRs have been updated to version 11.0.0 to match the Maximal Starting Repertoire version 5 (MSR-5 [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/11xlBYw0OHKZbkGL9qIF...>). It will be highly appreciated if you could provide your feedback by Friday, 3 March 2023. If we can be any of assistant for you to review these Reference LGRs, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Best Regards, Pitinan Kooarmornpatana IDN Program, Senior Manager ICANN _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org<mailto:Latingp@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1NA7BkJpAjSW33m9BJxx...> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1I8xGIEQPEUxAJMwcBux...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1AKbTR1Y4uHT7-EEf2wr...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.