Dear Latin GP As discussed in the call on 17 Sep 2020. Please find the summary of the previous discussion on consistency regarding Grave and Hook Above as follow. * IP feedback before the F2F meeting * In the latest feedback from the IP, the case of I with Grave and I with Hook Above are not specifically included as they are not marked as variant code points. * However, the IP commented on the above diacritics that “In particular, the effects of transitivity need to be considered, so as to avoid unwieldy variant sets or resulting transitive variants among diacritics that are, or should be, considered distinct.” * During the F2F meeting in Jan 2020. * The Grave and Hook above was discussed for the letter o e a u y. ( the letter ‘ i ‘ was not included in the discussion set) * By using 5 out of 7 voting mechanism, o e cases were not variant and a u y cases were variant. * The GP discussed about the consistence and agreed to keep them as is. * letter “i” was not in the discussion set and the i case are not variant according to the votes. * Latin GP Call on 21 May 2020 * The decision from the F2F meeting in the Google Sheet was reviewed. The GP went through each tab (a, e, i, o, u, consonant) and confirmed. However, the GP did not discuss the I with Grave ( ì , 00EC) and I with Hook Above ( ỉ, 1EC9) case. They remained non variants. * During the review, GP discussed the consistence of a two cases i.e. Vietnamese cases; and c, n, z acute and dot above. * The item for small letter I and I with acute was raised. The GP agreed to confirm the decision from F2F meeting as they are, and this issue will be added in the agenda for the next meetings. * As the meeting note only captured that the decision was confirmed, please listen to the recording for more detail (at 00:28:10 ~ 00:33) * Latin GP Call on 4 June 2020 * The Grave and Hook above was revisited for the letter ‘o’. Mirjana changed her vote, and the GP concluded that O with Grave and O with Hook Above were variant code points. * Latin GP Call on 16 July 2020 * The Grave and Hook above for the letter ‘e’ was discussed. The GP noted that there is inconsistence but agreed to keep the current decision for this version of the proposal. Therefore e with Grave and e with Hook Above are not variant code points. The call meeting notes and the recordings can be found at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP In addition, please note that there are two versions for the diacritic variant analysis. 1. The version that capture the decisions from the F2F meeting<https://1drv.ms/x/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3lqQ6_iGgpBvGbs?e=ubVKCz>. It locates at the outer most of the Latin GP One Drive. File name “Visual Variants – Analysis F2F.xlsx” 2. The version that capture most recent decisions<https://1drv.ms/x/s!AoE6DtesaqpIhCqbCMWkQ9GgmXTA?e=GM2T3x> e.g. O with Grave and O with Hook Above become variant. It locates in the Reviewing Version Folder, file name “Visual Variants – Diacritics 20200827.xlsx” Regards, Pitinan