Agenda for Latin GP call on November 11th , 2020 17:00UTC
Dear GP members, Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our next call. Any comments, corrections and suggestions are welcome. Regards Mirjana Agenda for Latin GP call on November 11th , 2020 17:00UTC 1. Appendix C reordering of letters, Bill’s proposal e-mail on 23.7 2020: “I had a couple of thought on cosmetic changes to this Appendix, to improve usability. · I think the entry for Latin Small Letter Ae should come after all of the entries for Letter A · I think the entry for Latin Small Letter Eth should come after all of the entries for Letter D · I think the entries for Latin Small Letter Open E should follow all of the entries for Letter E · I think the entries for Latin Small Letter Open O should follow all of the entries for Letter O. · I think the entry for Ligature Oe should follow the entries for Open O These are, I would say, cosmetic. We certainly can send the document to the IP for review without doing them. But I would like to see them happen before we go to public comment. “ 1. Capital Letters Discussion, Mats sent an e-mail on 23.7 2020 At the start of our work it was forbidden to talk about capital letters. Now we have had a long discussion about capital I with and without dot, so I think it is time that we look at another phenomenon in our data. Note that I do not argue that we should create new variant sets, just that we should look at it before we send the report out for comment. In our repertoire we have U+00F0, U+0111 and U+0256. Those lower case letters are distinct so that is not the problem. The potential issue is that the capital letters of those three are homoglyphs, not just similar. You can see below how they look like. I have enclosed them below in different typefaces. U+00F0 LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH U+00D0 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH U+0111 LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH STROKE U+0110 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE U+0256 LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH TAIL U+0189 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AFRICAN D I think this should be mentioned in the text and the reason why we do not think it is a problem (if that is the conclusion). Pasted in the same order as above with small letter a in between, in in Helvetica, Times New Roman and New Courier: aÐaĐaƉa aÐaĐaƉa aÐaĐaƉa The same as picture: [cid:image001.png@01D6B844.DC81CF70] 1. Review of the Appendix E: Confusable. 2. Next call to be decided during this call 3. AOB
Dear colleagues, I can‘t really speak right now cause of a bad throat, so I‘ll have to skip today’s meeting. I hope to join you again next week, Best, Meikal Am 11. Nov. 2020, 16:08 +0100 schrieb Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs>:
Dear GP members,
Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our next call. Any comments, corrections and suggestions are welcome.
Regards Mirjana
Agenda for Latin GP call on November 11th , 2020 17:00UTC
1. Appendix C reordering of letters, Bill’s proposal e-mail on 23.7 2020:
“I had a couple of thought on cosmetic changes to this Appendix, to improve usability. I think the entry for Latin Small Letter Ae should come after all of the entries for Letter A I think the entry for Latin Small Letter Eth should come after all of the entries for Letter D I think the entries for Latin Small Letter Open E should follow all of the entries for Letter E I think the entries for Latin Small Letter Open O should follow all of the entries for Letter O. I think the entry for Ligature Oe should follow the entries for Open O These are, I would say, cosmetic. We certainly can send the document to the IP for review without doing them. But I would like to see them happen before we go to public comment. “
2. Capital Letters Discussion, Mats sent an e-mail on 23.7 2020
At the start of our work it was forbidden to talk about capital letters. Now we have had a long discussion about capital I with and without dot, so I think it is time that we look at another phenomenon in our data.
Note that I do not argue that we should create new variant sets, just that we should look at it before we send the report out for comment.
In our repertoire we have U+00F0, U+0111 and U+0256. Those lower case letters are distinct so that is not the problem. The potential issue is that the capital letters of those three are homoglyphs, not just similar. You can see below how they look like. I have enclosed them below in different typefaces.
U+00F0 LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH U+00D0 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH
U+0111 LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH STROKE U+0110 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE
U+0256 LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH TAIL U+0189 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AFRICAN D
I think this should be mentioned in the text and the reason why we do not think it is a problem (if that is the conclusion).
Pasted in the same order as above with small letter a in between, in in Helvetica, Times New Roman and New Courier:
aÐaĐaƉa aÐaĐaƉa aÐaĐaƉa
The same as picture:
<image001.png>
3. Review of the Appendix E: Confusable. 4. Next call to be decided during this call 5. AOB
_______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Meikal Mumin -
Mirjana Tasić