Dear Tijani,

Since I saw that you did not access the google document , I would like to share with you what I put on the google document  with regard to Issue 2 – Precision in Scoping Work, where I do not see it as part of the MSM because  with regard to the scoping of ICANN work this is within the scope of PDP 3.0, again it is a suggested path that might provide a solution but is yet to be seen and any other suggestions we make is also a suggested path that will need to be seen, so why do we embark on a new path when we haven't seen the result of the existing yet. As with regard to the scoping of the work of the community, the community participates in the MEAC SWG and in the implementation phase so what other role are we suggesting? So are we suggesting creating some more community groups? I do not think this would be efficient, making better use of the existing ones and the existing process in this regard is better.

Dear All, please continue providing your inputs

Best

Hadia

From: Middle-East [mailto:middle-east-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Tijani BEN JEMAA
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2019 7:17 PM
To: Amr Elsadr
Cc: Hadia El Miniawi; middle-east@icann.org
Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Montreal ME Space statement first draft for your comment

Dear Amr,

I do apologize for the confusion. I meant it’s implementation is not adopted, and is even not ready yet to be put for public comment.

@ Nadira, PDP 3.0 was proposed as potential solution in the public consultation we are responding to; that’s why I mentioned it.

Best

Le 8 oct. 2019 à 14:35, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> a écrit :

Hi,

For what it’s worth, my understanding is that the PDP 3.0 has been adopted quite a while ago, and should be fully implemented within the first quarter of 2020. There are regular updates on implementation of PDP 3.0 during monthly GNSO Council meetings. I’ve attached the slide deck from its September 2019 meeting, which includes the expected timeline to wrap up implementation.

The slide deck can also be found under “Item 9” here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Documents+19+September+2019

Thanks.

Amr

On Oct 8, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

Thank you Tijani for your constructive feedback and suggestions.

I'm in agreement except of this point 

The PDP 3.0 presented as possible solution can’t be considered since it’s is not yet adopted. We believe that this issue should be part of the MSM work plan

Simply because those who know about the PDP 3.0 are very few. The statement has to reflect of the knowledge and understanding of the majority.

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 14:33 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn> wrote:

Dear Hadia and all,

First of all, I would like to thank Hadia for this excellent draft. I have some inputs that I want to provide (see the file).

I used the red color for text that I propose to remove, blue for text I propose to add and Green  for my comment.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BENJEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Telephone: +216 52 385 114
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PDP 3.0 Council Presentation - 19 Sep 2019 (v2).pdf>

Tijani BEN JEMAA