We (AFCN) do not favor any fee or contribution, at this time.

On 6/13/07, Bret Fausett <bfausett@internet.law.pro > wrote:

Keep in mind that end users already fund over 80% of ICANN's budget
through assessments imposed by ICANN and collected through
ICANN-accredited registries and registrars. Personally, the idea that we
would pay more seems absurd to me.

     -- Bret


_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter
Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance
Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition
President, Association For Community Networking

Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance:   http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org

_______________________________________________

NA-Discuss mailing list

NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org

---

Draft MoU with ICANN:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

Draft Operating Principles:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

Draft Code of Conduct:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct