July 15, 2010
1:20 a.m.
On 14 July 2010 20:15, Gareth Shearman <shearman@victoria.tc.ca> wrote:
I have now read Danny's paper and, on first look, I think it makes a lot of sense.
I know we are all concerned with the projected costs of new GTLDs - why not support something like this?
If the region wants to support it I will too, but Danny's paper says nothing about the cost of TLDs. The price of second-level domains is not at issue. At very least, his solution is clearly outside the mandate and scope of the working group. That's not to say it is without merit, but it is ill-conceived to address the challenge given to the WG. But that's just my opinion. What does everyone else think? - Evan