RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
> -Individuals should
predominately represented
> -organizational membership within an ALS
should be OK
> -this conversation is inflammatory
> -individual
at-large membership should be either a) put into a
> subgroup or b)
referred to an ALS
And I'm agreed with Randy on all points.
I
would also make explicit that in the case of orgs-within-orgs,
the
participating subgroups must themselves be membership bodies similar
to
the existing requirement of ALSs. I wouldn't want this to be used as
a
backdoor to allow in groups that otherwise would not qualify for
acceptance.
-
Evan
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss
mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft
MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft
Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP