Hi Michael
The ALAC is looking at the criteria (started before Lisbon, draft
now & comments, should be finalized soon)
If you check the agenda for the last ALAC teleconf on the wiki, you
should see the draft documents. Can’t find the link now…
I understand why people want to be in ALAC and RALOs rather
than in NCUC sometimes, but we need to fix the criteria to be able to sort this
out. I am hoping to have a final document incorporating all comments by the May
ALAC teleconference.
Jacqueline
From: Michael Maranda
[mailto:mmaranda@afcn.org]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:05 PM
To: NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Action Items
Have these issues been
resolved? When will they be resolved? I dont think disparaging
their interest in involvement is warranted. A fundamental lack of
understanding of what community networking is all about is the root of the
problem.
On 4/16/07, John L <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
We had enough trouble dealing
with outfits that don't meet the criteria
(they belong in the NCUC) but for some unfathomable reason really really
really want to be ALS, then get the ICANN ombudsman involved who doesn't
understand the ALS rules either, leading to an incredible bureaucratic
timesink that distracted the ALAC for months.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter
Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance
Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition
President, Association For Community Networking
Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance: http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date: 4/15/2007 4:22
PM