HI John,

As said yesterday.  It should be an alternate. In fact, At large is now requiring both a primary and a secondary alternative for each ALS.  In some cases they are even asking for two alternates. Please modify the document to include this

Best,

Judith

_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

On 3/29/2017 2:32 PM, John More wrote:

Good point. The question is whether it should be a proxy or an alternative, or both.

John More

On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Gordon Chillcott <gordontc@look.ca> wrote:

I've noticed that 3.2 of the proposed ROP requires each ALS to select
one "voting representative".

There does not seem to be any allowance for a designated proxy in cases
where the voting representative is temporarily unable to act for any
reason.

In my own case, for example, I am not able to attend the upcoming
General Assembly and my ALS has designated another representative.



Gordon Chillcott


------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------

------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------

------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------