all,
In doing a quick online search, I came across this old CircleId article that included, what appeared to be, a relevant quote (pasted below). In any case, this appeared to be a very brief article that barely scratches the surface.
quoting the author: "Thus, buying and selling domain names are speculative investments that can create, destroy, or transfer value."
In 2021, we are all aware of how Org's budget has expanded over the years (I believe now in excess of over US 100M), yet there appears to be a shortcoming in the collection of empirical data and market research on some of the most fundamental matters which fall under ICANN's public trust commitments. In this regard, I am reminded of Evan's previous comments on the essential role of the at-large community in both educating and informing gTLD policy development as being particularly pertinent to this discussion. For example, here are a few topics which I believe that progress could be made through the commissioning of (truly) independent study, research, and analysis:
- From an economic perspective, what market failures or needs do domain names address (e.g. can short, concise identifiers, effectively improve communication, and within a certain context, reduce searching costs). On this basis, how should the gTLD space be optimally structured to help ensure that domain names are able to meet these market failures/needs.
- How can the allocation of domain names harm public welfare and simultaneously impose significant social costs on Internet users and the consuming public. As the public steward of the DNS, what measures should ICANN be employing to address DNS abuse in legacy and new gTLDs.
What combination of methods (e.g. consensus policies, contracts, market mechanisms, enforcement) can best address and mitigate these consumer harms?
Hope helpful...cheers all.