I strongly agree with yourself and Michael.
 
Actually, towards the end of the 100 e-mails, there are actually some good suggestions coming forth.  It may have been a painful process but sometimes pain=gain.  If the PR person at ICANN's only suggestion is censorship then there is a serious problem here.
 
D

From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Evan Leibovitch
Sent: Sun 2/17/2008 5:59 PM
To: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] registrant advisory committee

Michael Maranda wrote:
> Also, for the record, I am greatly offended by Mr. Kieran McCarthy's
> tone on the At Large listserv.
I will reserve comment on Kieren's general competence, given what were
IMO serious mis-handling of a number of issues at the Delhi meeting
(translations, web sites, outreach, public feedback, etc.).

On this issue, I strongly agree with Michael.

What do others think? I'm fully prepared to escalate Michael's complaint
up the ICANN food chain.

- Evan


------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
Visit the NA-RALO Wiki at https://st.icann.org/naralo/
------