I am in complete agreement. So ironic the public participation
guy wants to shut down public participation!!
And by the way, speaking of transparency, is the "internal"
ALAC list archived and available for view? I'd sure like to track all
the policy development that goes on in there.
I feel another call for abandoning ALAC and creating an Internet
User's Union or something else coming on--
Jean Armour Polly
At 1:02 AM -0500 2/18/08, Thompson, Darlene recently said:
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C871F4.24E6C131"
I strongly agree with yourself and
Michael.
Actually,
towards the end of the 100 e-mails, there are actually some good
suggestions coming forth. It may have been a painful process but
sometimes pain=gain. If the PR person at ICANN's only suggestion
is censorship then there is a serious problem
here.
D
From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on
behalf of Evan Leibovitch
Sent: Sun 2/17/2008 5:59 PM
To: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] registrant advisory
committee
Michael Maranda
wrote:
> Also, for the record, I am greatly offended by Mr. Kieran
McCarthy's
> tone on the At Large listserv.
I will reserve comment on Kieren's general competence, given what
were
IMO serious mis-handling of a number of issues at the Delhi
meeting
(translations, web sites, outreach, public feedback, etc.).
On this issue, I strongly agree with Michael.
What do others think? I'm fully prepared to escalate Michael's
complaint
up the ICANN food chain.
- Evan
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
Visit the NA-RALO Wiki
at https://st.icann.org/naralo/
------
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
Visit the NA-RALO Wiki at https://st.icann.org/naralo/
------