I agree with all of you, mostly with Evan, and occasionally with myself.
I'm unsure about a change to the OP so soon, regardless of the subject matter. We could set a precedent for constantly bickering over what has been agreed on. And, this is what has always been done in the past. I wouldn't disagree though.
So far as translations, It is my opinion that this is why we have ALSs to spread the word to our constituencies. I think we should also point out that we should have every document produced translated into Navajo and Hawaiian. However we have finite resources.
I agree we should recognize Spanish. I also agree we should recognize Hawaiian, French, Navajo, English, Inuit, Hoosier, and Texan.
Just $0.02
aloha,
Randy Glass
A@L
Thompson, Darlene wrote:
> Errrr... Evan, I pretty much agree with you except that we have an
> up-coming vote for Chair and Secretariat that our OP won't allow
> (co-chairs and co-secretariats).
>
> Its really for this time and this time only that I am suggesting these
> changes. Then I would be 100% agreeable to semi-annual or even annual
> reviews. You are very right that we cannot allow ourselves to become
> totally embroiled in administrivia. I also do not think that the
> changes that I am proposing will cause much "hue and cry" or debate.
> They seem to be fairly common sense.
>
Agreed. Ditto for the recognition of Spanish. Unless I'm missing
something, both these issues are non-controversial and can probably be
done expediently by consensus.
Let's just get on with it. :-)
- Evan
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct