On 16/02/07, Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com> wrote:

Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
> Perhaps your comments to the committee about improving ALACs approval
> process predated my involvement - or perhaps I need more coffee. In either
> case, in this public forum, may I suggest that the present time would be
> ideal to forward them for discussion?

Sure, I repeat my earlier suggestion that we adopt a "default approve"
policy for ALS applications. Applicants should be deemed to meet the
requirements and therefore approved unless specific reasons of
non-compliance are identified. If no one on the ALAC has actively
voiced objections and called for a vote by the deadline, we approve the
applicant.

--Wendy

--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/